A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 weeks ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.43 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
4
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 01, 2023: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color the ceiling , east and south walls in the bathroom located at apt 3i, 3rd story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Immediately hazardous
3
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 31, 2020: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 1i, 1st story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
N
Name Not On File
3.4(2)
Owner•
3 Properties•48 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
A
Advanced Mgnt Services
3.4(2)
Agent•
3 Properties•48 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
A
Advanced Management
3.4(2)
Agent•
7 Properties•91 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
D
Dorchester Hghts Condommium Owners
3.4(2)
Corporate Owner•
4 Properties•89 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
2.88 stars
3 months ago
Beware of Bad Management
Former Tenant
Pros:
the neighbors were fantastic and helpful. literally got a few keys from my neighbor because the landlords never provided them.
Cons:
the landlords are unresponsive, almost always out of the country, and downright lazy. #1i’s basement floods and when notifying the landlords, it took 7 months for them to address it (conveniently right when they decided they wanted to sell the unit/no longer rent).
Advice to owner:
get a different job because property management surely isn’t your strong suit
4 stars
Over 2 years ago
Building is fine, but avoid #2K
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building is relatively well-maintained, there were some roaches when we moved in but regular pest control seems to have been doing its job a year later.
Cons:
Not so much a problem with the building as with the unit, as it's a condo. I lived in unit 2K for a year and wanted to stay after my roommates left, and the owner, Jocelyn, repeatedly assured me she'd like me to stay and come up with new roommates before illegally giving me a week's notice that she had found new tenants and would no longer be considering any roommates I submitted for her consideration and would have to move out in a week. Then her agent tried to BS me about how it wasn't actually illegal (consultation with 311's tenant helpline and an acquaintance with experience in housing law reaffirmed that I was in the right that 30 days' notice of non-renewal of tenancy was required by law and she was lying to me).
Advice to owner:
Learn the law, follow it, and don't lie to your tenants about it.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here