A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 5 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.75 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
5
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Sep 15, 2024: § 329, m/d law and dept. rules and regs. provide a completed certificate of inspection visits in a proper frame at or near mailboxes, bottom edge of frame between 48-62 inches above floor missing at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 29, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
W
Washington Towers Condominium
3.5(4)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•16 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
U
Unavailable Owner
3.5(4)
Owner•
2 Properties•16 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
C
Cathleen Caron
3.5(4)
Head Officer•
2 Properties•16 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
D
D & D Management
3.2(6)
Agent•
60 Properties•431 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
2.75 stars
Over 1 year ago
Serious building construction flaws
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location is excellent with access to multiple subway lines and Prospect Park in a short walk. On move in, the building and unit seemed beautiful and well maintained (but please see cons for the reality).
Cons:
I was forced to move out in just 2 months because of severe damage due to a burst pipe that also affected nearly every other unit below mine in the building. My landlord claimed that we left a window open during cold weather to cause it and refused to acknowledge various issues that have existed since the building's construction (see https://casetext.com/case/bd-of-managers-of-647-649-place-condo-v-647-649-wash-ave-llc). He never offered to speak with us, and we only communicated with him via email and his property manager. The absentee landlord Jyoti Cessna lives in Australia and in retrospect was clearly not interested in making prompt repairs to restore habitability, so despite waiting patiently based on his promise that repairs would happen quickly, we returned from temporary arrangements to move out our remaining undamaged belongings at the end of January. He eventually made it clear in a rude email that he felt entitled to profit regardless of what happened, and I had to fight just to receive any of the security deposit back.
We had complained previously that there could be drastic temperature fluctuations within different parts of each room due to extremely poor quality drafty windows, PTAC units shutting off too early, and inadequate insulation. These complaints were ignored. The terrible windows are the original ones installed in every unit in the building, and in the case of my unit, the landlord had taped and stuffed socks in the window frames to stop drafts and water leaks (unfortunately, I did not notice until I had already signed the lease and moved in). I actually confirmed that at one point, one side of the primary bedroom was 56 degrees despite the other side being 70 due to the level of heat loss.
While moving out I noticed a small roof leak forming in another room, and the bathroom heaters stopped working. I am leaving this review as a warning to others considering renting in this condo building because even in the unlikely case you have a more reasonable landlord, it will take time for all the necessary repairs to keep the building safe and habitable in the long run to happen. Note that most other rented units are owned by Fouad and Munzer, who are responsible for developing this building.
2.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
647 review
Former Tenant
Pros:
Small condo building with direct to apartment elevator access.
Cons:
Condo management company is mediocre at best. At worst, they allow the elevator to be constantly mis-aligned with the floors, broken ceiling fans, or otherwise in less than desirable condition. The front door was broken for months and only after several tenants complained about stolen packages was it rectified. The garbage room is insanely small and poorly organized. There is no bike or other storage in the building. Packages also have no place to be delivered except on the floor in front of the mail boxes, which is also in full view of passersby.
Since it is a condo building that also has renters (about a 50/50 split), some have a different situation. The renters, who rent from Double M Management / Fouad Elayyan have it the worst. They are totally incompetent and lack any empathy towards their tenants problems. They ignore tour requests for fixes constantly — even small things like replacing the lock on your door because it no longer works (a $15 fix). Avoid them at all costs.
Advice to owner:
Act like you could be fired and lose your client. It does not take much effort for the people in your building to organize and decide to get quotes from other building management companies.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here