NYC Buildings
/
Brooklyn
/
DUMBO
/
133 Water Street

133 Water Street,
Brooklyn, NY 11201

52 Units

Built in 1894

12 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.01 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 25, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
V
Venture NY Property Management, LLC
2.9(2)
Agent
4 Properties124 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
S
Sandra Castellano
4.3(4)
Site Manager
Officer
12 Properties205 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
R
Roebling Court Condominium
3.6(15)
Corporate Owner
83 Properties1146 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
U
Unavailable Owner
4.6(1)
Owner
1 Property52 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (1)

Over 1 year ago
Quiet, family oriented building.
Former Tenant
Pros:
-Doorman in the daytime.
-Package room with cold storage.
-Nice roof deck.
-Quiet neighbors.
-Elevators always work and the delivery elevator is big.
-Dog friendly and very close to park.
-Heat/AC are always turned on and working most units have central air.
-Common areas are cleaned daily and the building is very strict on not letting tenants leave trash or store things in hallways and stairwells.
Cons:
The main issue for renters is that the condo board is very much oriented to saving owners money.

So amenities like the gym are a little dated and there are just fewer perks than some of the other nearby mid-rise rental buildings.

There’s also a big issue with doormen having a reliable schedule. So you can’t count on them to accept an important package or provide access for cleaners or dog walkers.
Advice to owner:
Make sure you are communicating with both owners and renters. As a renter I often don’t get notices about maintenance or other useful building information.

Have a plan to continually invest in the common areas so that the building remains competitive with the newer units in the immediate area.

Rental rates are now well within the “luxury” category but, much of the building common area finishes don’t hold up when compared to similar priced nearby buildings.

Also, when signing the lease there are a lot of fees (about $5,000). I almost thought I was getting scammed because of the the number of different $1,000 payments I had to make. If you just bundle the move-in/move-out deposits and the application fee that would make it much easier and less scammy feeling.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here