A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 3 weeks ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
F
Firstservice Residential
4.1(2)
Agent•
1 Property•216 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
R
Ryan Black
4.1(2)
Head Officer•
1 Property•216 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
W
Wojciech Rojinski
4.1(2)
Site Manager•
1 Property•216 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
O
Oosten Condominium
4.1(2)
Corporate Owner•
1 Property•216 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
3.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
Facade of Luxury, Too Far from Transit
Former Tenant
Pros:
Modern appearances, quiet environment, neat architectural concept, great front staff, unbeatable rooftop.
Cons:
Finishes and appliances are nicer in appearance than in usage. Building was out together cheaply despite outside appearances with floods common. Gym is a joke with bizarre sauna arrangement. Courtyard and roof limit guests and pets. The board that runs the building will nickel and dime you for the weirdest things at large costs.
4.75 stars
Over 3 years ago
Great building, but I hate firstservice residential
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great pool, building finishes, friendly staff & other amenities
Cons:
Units have SMEG electric ovens that are a pain to fix and use just in general. Too small if you really like to cook, I’ve burned the knobs just by having a pan slightly too forward. Only one maintenance guy allowed in the building. Address of the building marketed isn’t the real address which can cause issues if you’re never notified of that. If you need to hear anything useful from FirstServiceResidential, good luck. Apartment manager is kind of rude.
Advice to owner:
Have an organized procedure for move-ins to get renters/owners on the same page
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here