Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 5 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.52 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
14
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Sep 10, 2024: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... less than 10 square feet at east wall in the bathroom located at apt 4f, 4th story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Hazardous
22
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 07, 2024: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak at ceiling sprinkler and vent in the kitchen located at apt 4a, 4th story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
Immediately hazardous
22
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 23, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of mice in the entire apartment located at apt 7a, 7th story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
Z
Zev Baum 1 LLC
3.1(55)
Corporate Owner•
34 Properties•324 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 10
M
Mark Berkowitz
2.7(12)
Agent•
Head Officer•
2 Properties•44 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 1
L
Lefferts Property Holdings LLC
3.4(13)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•48 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
T
Tom Rosenberg
3.1(37)
Agent•
Head Officer•
23 Properties•200 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 7
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (12)
3.88 stars
Over 1 year ago
492 Lefferts Ave
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice neighborhood, near the park, balcony, central heat/AC (not all units), package & mail delivery are relatively secure, in-building laundry (3 W&D), soundproof walls— never hear the neighbors unless in the hallway. Rent stabilized!
Cons:
Can’t open our dishwasher because of it’s proximity to our oven— there isn’t enough clearance with the over handle, so that’s annoying. Serious mouse issue in the building but exterminator is on call. Pretty responsive maintenance team, but not always the most competent. Common areas (rooftop, lounges, gym, laundry) are trashed and never maintained. Be aware that it’s a religious neighborhood and the local groceries & other stores nearby are closed Friday/Saturday, so you’ll have to adjust your schedule accordingly if that’s not already a part of your routine. Gym is tiny, damp & overcrowded with machines
Advice to owner:
Better, functional planning of layout. Maintain common areas!!!!
3.62 stars
Over 1 year ago
Good not great
Former Tenant
Pros:
Balcony, rooftop, elevator, AC
Cons:
Materials are cheap, unit was not cleaned before we moved in
3.12 stars
Over 1 year ago
This building is clean
Former Tenant
Pros:
This building is quiet and the tenants are respectful
Cons:
I’m surprised to learn some tenants have the privilege of NOT GETTING CHARGED for the heat and hot water bill from ConEdison. Also, the tenant has been ignoring my phone calls and emails regarding any issues I report. Two weeks ago, one tenant on the 6th floor was surprised to see a stranger opened up the apartment she’s occupying with her newborn. Once the stranger, which looked like a young lady in her twenties, noticed the apartment was not vacant she rushed to leave. The tenant’s husband reported it to the building management, no one give a follow up to this incident.
Advice to owner:
The owner needs to pay attentive to all tenants. This owner just deliberately ignored black tenants requests and concerns
2.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
Walls are paper thin - but not the worst place to live?
Former Tenant
Pros:
The community in the building was good and the units themselves were fine.
Cons:
Walls were so thin between units you could hear EVERYTHING your neighbors did. Felt like it was cheap construction and will fall apart in the next five years. Amenities are bad and not maintained at all. The kitchens are effectively not usable due to their size and no ventilation. The range and oven - while it worked - is the worst I've ever used. Ever unit claims it has one more "bedroom" than actually makes sense for the living space - making the units VERY overpriced. Also, we had a mouse in our unit that chewed through clothes and shoes.
Advice to owner:
Next time - build a better building and spend some money to keep it clean/in a quality condition instead of falling apart in four years
2.62 stars
Over 2 years ago
Just don't live here
Former Tenant
Pros:
The price points during the pandemic/ lockdown were great and the renting process is very easy.
Cons:
Lack of care for building. Heat is never on. If they do work on the building you don't get notified. The front door always breaks and packages get stolen. Elevator breaks down often. Not clean. The stairwell is unfinished.
Advice to owner:
Do better please.
2.25 stars
Over 2 years ago
Not bad overall
Former Tenant
Pros:
Pretty good amenities
Cons:
Not very attentive management
2.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Pros and Cons of living in 492 Lefferts Ave
Former Tenant
Pros:
-laundry and washer -gym -parking garage -study room -social area -luxury apartment -dishwasher -bathroom fixtures
Cons:
-non-responsive and inconsiderate management -thin walls- noise travels through walls very clearly -non-responsive building manger -No doorman- Virtual doorman only -shared patio is terrible when sharing with obnoxious and inconsiderate neighbors who monopolize the patio area -mice
Advice to owner:
Make sure you do a pest control prior to moving into the apartment. Also don’t recommend taking any apartments on the second floor that have a shared patio unless you are okay with noise and people in your space. If you like personal space, I don’t recommend it. Also do some research on your neighbors prior to moving in. Bad neighbors and bad management can make a good apartment building toxic.
2.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Not great but not the worst building I’ve lived in
Former Tenant
Pros:
- new construction - relatively clean
Cons:
- packages regularly go missing - unresponsive management - very poor insulation so heating/cooling bills are $200+ a month - very expensive parking in a narrow garage
Advice to owner:
Be more proactive in managing the building and there might be less turnover
3 stars
Over 2 years ago
LOOKS ARE DECEIVING
Former Tenant
Pros:
- Excellent amenities (laundry room, gym, lounge, study room, furnished rooftop, bike storage, elevator, trash chute on every floor) - Clean and modern
Cons:
- Rude/noisy/hostile neighbors - Neighbors are not respectful of shared spaces (deterioting state of amenities) - Loud (thin walls exacerbate the problem) - Lack of privacy and personal space - Management and super is nonexistent - Landlord response rate is poor (months for a single response) - Lots of rodents and bugs around building - Low value for money (rent is priced to high for this area) - Safety concerns (stolen packages/general theft, shootings nearby, and other crimes are common)
Advice to owner:
- Improve response times - Hold bad neighbors accountable of their actions. - Create stricter guidelines for shared spaces - Hire a live-in super - Improve building maintenance and pest control
2.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Nonexistent landlord? Do they exist?
Former Tenant
Pros:
No bugs, laundry in basement.
Cons:
Have lived here a year and never once heard back about any issues from the super/landlord. Walls are so thin we hear neighbors AT ALL TIMES! Literally hear them as I’m typing this :) cheap appliances and showers/sinks don’t drain properly no matter how much cleaning and draino.
Advice to owner:
Respond to your tenants!
1.62 stars
Over 2 years ago
Avoid if possible
Former Tenant
Pros:
New building, apartments look nice but the building is built with cheap materials.
Cons:
Management is unresponsive and incompetent, neighbors are loud and ignorant, there are basically no rules and everyone does as they please. Pest control was horrible in the beginning, there were mice issues from first to seventh floor, there were unattended leaks. Lounge rooms are filthy as children are hanging out there, gym is not well kept, lounge chairs on the rooftop are destroyed.
Advice to owner:
Hire a competent management company.
2.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
DO NOT MOVE IN
Former Tenant
Pros:
The cleanliness of the building is superb.
Cons:
The noise level is bad. Parties all times of the night from tenants in building and there is a Jewish community roof top center that blasts music and the police department ( 71st ) pct will not do anything about it.