NYC Buildings
/
Brooklyn
/
Flatbush
/
2217 Caton Avenue

2217 Caton Avenue,
Brooklyn, NY 11226

29 Units

Built in 2009

9 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.79 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
9
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Nov 13, 2023: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department the ceiling and east wall at public hall, 9th story
Show all
flag
Hazardous
11
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Feb 28, 2024: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... approx square feet at east wall in the 2nd room from east located at apt 9c, 9th story, 1st apartment from north at east original violation 16342406 issued 27-oct-23 has been upgraded to class b per administrative code §27-2017.3a(3)(a) or (b).
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
3
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 11, 2021: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code remove the illegal fastening consisting of an unacceptable electromagnetic locking device install at the front door at public hall, 1st story
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
E
Ed Berisha
4.2(4)
Site Manager
1 Property29 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 1
C
Caton Acquisition Partners, LLC
4.4(5)
Corporate Owner
2 Properties62 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 1
C
Caton Acquisitions LLC
4.2(4)
Agent
1 Property29 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 1
C
Clinton 525 LLC
3.8(81)
Corporate Owner
32 Properties1173 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 18
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (4)

Over 2 years ago
No serious concerns
Former Tenant
Pros:
Apartment layout and size
Proximity to the park
Rent prices
Appliances
Cons:
Management could care more
Very limited parking
Noise from the street
Advice to owner:
Be more organized and responsive with you tennants
Over 2 years ago
Good but will not renew
Former Tenant
Pros:
Rooms are good size.
Cons:
Property management sucks, leaks, mold, washer & dryers are really old and doesn’t work properly, stolen packages, balcony is not maintained, gym is not maintained properly
Advice to owner:
Respond to tenants when they ask to fix something.
Over 2 years ago
Goog appartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
- Nice location (between Q/B and 2/5 trains)
- Gym
Cons:
The main door is very inconvenient for disabled people or families with kids.
Over 3 years ago
Simple review of building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Amenities and noise
Cons:
Management was terrible
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here