Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.03 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
2
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 17, 2024: § 329, m/d law and dept. rules and regs. provide a completed certificate of inspection visits in a proper frame at or near mailboxes, bottom edge of frame between 48-62 inches above floor [ missing frame ] at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
G
97 Grand Avenue Bk LLC
3.8(9)
Corporate Owner•
3 Properties•106 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 2
S
Silverstone Property Group, LLC
3.7(83)
Agent•
50 Properties•1641 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 24
J
Julia Rodriguez
3.8(70)
Head Officer•
37 Properties•1408 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 19
E
361 East 50th Street LLC
3.7(79)
Corporate Owner•
51 Properties•1679 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 24
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (5)
2.5 stars
3 weeks ago
If you can avoid it, do so
Former Tenant
Pros:
Big apartments with lots of natural light. The appliances are full-sized and generally in working condition
Cons:
The elevator is ALWAYS broken. There's a good chance you're going to get stuck in there... Also ever since we got new management in Jan 2024 there has been a seriously disgusting fly issue in the building. No matter how high up you are, the flies come in from the basement through the stairs and elevators and it is so unsanitary. The building is quite prone to leaks when there are heavy rains... had 2 separate recurring leaks in my own apartment and the lobby had a huge one as well. There is also a lot of theft in the building because of the clear lobby floor-to-ceiling glass paneling and terrible placement of the mailbox.
Advice to owner:
Start thinking about your tenants for once please!
3 stars
4 weeks ago
Large apartments at the expense of terrible mgmt company
Former Tenant
Pros:
spacious apt, good heating overall, decent response to fixing things
Cons:
fly infestation, unresponsive management, blerina is terrible and mgmt treats you like animals. Barely and cleaning staff at times.
Advice to owner:
start spending more money on the livelihood of your tenants! respond more!
4.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
Big apartments, horrible management
Former Tenant
Pros:
The apartments themselves are in pretty good condition. There’s always going to be something wrong with an nyc apartment, but as far as I know no pests, no major leaks, etc. the super and his assistant are always on top of everything and will come to help at any hour
Cons:
Management is totally useless. Impossible to reach them by phone and they take months to answer emails in what seems like them trying to have the upper hand in any matter. Elevator breaks often and I’ve already seen 5 people get stuck in there with the fire dept having to come to take them out in the year I’ve lived here. Roof access is restricted and doesn’t really have any furniture in comparison to neighboring buildings.
Advice to owner:
Do something about the elevator and resolve issues more quickly!!!
4.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
Good Place, with hidden costs
Former Tenant
Pros:
Building was maintained well, and the tenants in the building mostly kept to themselves. The views from the roof were spectacular, and you could usually find a seat up there whenever you wanted. Close to Key Foods, and the Brooklyn Navy Yard.
Cons:
The CTAC AC/Heating units were substandard, and on were barely able to keep up with the summer heat. ConEd bills would run in the +$300 range during the summer, and in the winter, temps could drop to the 50s even with the units running full time. You would assume at the price you pay for these apartments, the AC would at least work. The location of this build is pretty far from the train as well, but if you work from home this isn't a concern.
Advice to owner:
Instead of rotating the CTAC units, they should be entirely replaced with modern machines that can operate more efficiently.
4 stars
Over 2 years ago
Clean and effective
Former Tenant
Pros:
Responsive to apartment inquiries
Cons:
Elevator is out often Water pressure can be better