504 Myrtle Path,Brooklyn, NY 11205
143 Units
•Built in 2015
•8 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Evictions: 2
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 5 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.03 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
4
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jan 23, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color at ceiling and west wall in the kitchen located at apt 3c, 3rd story, 4th apartment from west at north
Show all
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 23, 2024: § 27-2031 adm code provide hot water at all hot water fixtures in the entire apartment located at apt 7t, 7th story, 7th apartment from east at south
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
S
Silverstone Property Group, LLC
3.6(84)
Agent•
50 Properties•1641 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 24
M
504 Myrtle Residential Owner LLC
3.7(8)
Corporate Owner•
3 Properties•187 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 4
J
Julia Rodriguez
3.8(70)
Head Officer•
37 Properties•1408 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 19
V
Vesa Naka
3.5(6)
Site Manager•
2 Properties•143 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (6)
3 stars
Over 1 year ago
Do not live here
Former Tenant
Pros:
I liked my actual apartment but that’s it. The apartment isn’t worth the building madness
Cons:
Building management is absolutely terrible. Avoid the 3rd floor especially. Crazy neighbor and cops were making visits regularly and the entire floor smells like drugs
4.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Pretty good but room for improvement
Former Tenant
Pros:
Clean modern building, only had to make maintenance calls for super minor issues and when I did response was super quick. Roof is great (when open) and I loved my apt as well.
Cons:
Annoying that the roof closes at 10, has guest limits, and completely closes for ~5 months of the year in winter. Also annoyed me that the listing made it seem like there is in building bike storage when there really is not (you can park bikes in building next door but its inconvenient to get to and they tried to charge me $50 a month to do so). Massive discount on first years rent (3 months “free”) meant that second year would cost $500+ more a month for a studio and just wasn’t worth it to stay.
3.25 stars
Over 2 years ago
2 Years and Meh Experience
Former Tenant
Pros:
Clean, right by a lot of stuff, no pests.
Cons:
They'll sell you on a roof with accessible grill but it rarely works. They take ages to respond to any issues. Very unreasonable in negotiating anything.
Advice to owner:
None.
2.88 stars
Over 3 years ago
504 Myrtle Avenue
Former Tenant
Pros:
Apartments are new, clean and updated. Great layout and design.
Cons:
The building management are thieves. They have a third party they use to contract heat and electricity (like their own con Edison) and they charge insane rates and won’t give an explanation of usage. I was charged 50$ for electricity bill when I was only there for one month in a one bedroom apartment. Average electricity is 150-200 for a one bedroom apartment.
Advice to owner:
Fire Tiffany Williams and stop overcharging tenants for bill
4.12 stars
Over 3 years ago
Prett great building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Clean and generally quiet, good garbage management, great heating and AC
Cons:
some noisy neighbors (not the buildings fault) and pretty unresponsive doormen
Advice to owner:
none
3.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
Basic Housing option
Former Tenant
Pros:
Large size and price
Cons:
Lack of management and response. Bad structure internally.
Advice to owner:
Make your management better
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here