A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.01 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
1
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Aug 30, 2024: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... less than 10 sq ft at east wall in the terrace located at apt 214, 2nd story, 2nd apartment from south at west
Show all
Hazardous
3
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Feb 25, 2021: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak at ceiling and north wall in the bathroom located at apt 426, 4th story, 2nd apartment from north at east , section at west
Show all
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Aug 31, 2020: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective wood floor in the 2nd room from north at west located at apt 906, 9th story, 3rd apartment from south at west
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
Y
Yitzchok Fruchthandler
3.6(9)
Agent•
Head Officer•
2 Properties•420 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
L
LA Cabana Apartments LLC
3.4(29)
Agent•
Head Officer•
17 Properties•1431 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 82
J
Johnathon Rodriguez
3.6(9)
Site Manager•
1 Property•372 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 1
B
Bedford Joint Venture LLC
3.6(9)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•420 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (9)
4.5 stars
6 months ago
Would recommend it
Former Tenant
Pros:
- Location, both to transit and the greenness of Eastern Parkway - Super and concierge are great - Great light
Cons:
- expensive for what you get - management can be aloof or unresponsive. Which is only an issue at the beginning and end of your lease
4.25 stars
6 months ago
Nice building but thin walls
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building staff was great. The apartments are nicely maintained and have nice fixtures. Location is near the Franklin express stop is excellent.
Cons:
Some residents were rude when using the amenities (e.g., playing loud music or smoking in the pool room). Also the walls are paper thin. I could hear my neighbor's music constantly.
2.38 stars
Over 1 year ago
Not worth the money
Former Tenant
Pros:
Hired good staff in the building, amenities were nice
Cons:
Building and amenities not cared for well. Very expensive rent for the location and what you’re getting. Significant security threat, recently FBI raided an apartment as there was a serial rapist living here.
4.62 stars
Over 1 year ago
A great place to live
Former Tenant
Pros:
The supers are very on top of maintenance requests. The apartments are nice and we’ve never had any issues with pests.
Cons:
The only con is that the common areas are not well taken care of.
2.62 stars
Over 1 year ago
Not completely horrible - but would not recommend
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice staff and neighbors. Tulu machine. Near Union Market and train. Dog spa. Rooftop. Gym.
Cons:
Roaches. People smoking constantly and smell of smoke in hallways and stairwells. Cleanliness and maintenance of building not great. For such a new building, it should not look so beat up. Amenities like lounge room are completely destroyed and things are never fixed, cleaned, or replaced. New front desk staff not very friendly or helpful. Package robberies from package room. Elevators out of order often. Things in apartment take forever to get fixed. It’s not up to par with what you expect to be getting for the price.
Advice to owner:
Get more eyes on the building and make sure stuff is getting fixed. Be on site more often and inspect the building. Invest in maintaining the building more than the absolute bare minimum.
4.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
Amazing yet expensive building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Everyone who works her is incredible. Great amenities, easy virtual doorman for packages, incredible light in the apartment
Cons:
Newly developing roach problem, rent went up a full $500 after my lease was up
Advice to owner:
Take care of the roaches. Put umbrellas up on the roof. Fix the printer so that it actually works!
4.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
Great building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Doormen are fantastic
Cons:
Minor delays in getting maintenance
2.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
It’s a hellhole
Former Tenant
Pros:
It looks pretty from the outside
Cons:
Management responds to all requests promptly saying they’re working on it, but nothing ever actually happens. Neighbors whose dogs bark all day and night. Damage done by maintenance never repaired. Trash rooms often overflowing. Holes in hallway walls from moving in and out never repaired. Trash juice never cleaned from the carpet. Workers let themselves in without even knocking and they said it was allowed because it was “an emergency” — the emergency was that was the day they had scheduled workers. No actual emergency. They didn’t even apologize. Just absolute garbage management charging obscene amounts of money.
Advice to owner:
Do better on LITERALLY every front. You’re setting yourself up for a lawsuit with your staff letting themselves into women’s homes without knocking.
2.38 stars
Over 3 years ago
Avoid this landlord
Former Tenant
Pros:
Close to the subway
Cons:
Things went downhill fast. BBQs are breaking and are not getting repaired, same applies for gym equipment. Garbage rooms are overflowing. No security in the building. The 24/7 doorman cut back to working hours.
Advice to owner:
Get things fixed, especially when your tenants are asking.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here