140 Stanhope Street,Brooklyn, NY 11221
9 Units
•Built in 2015
•5 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
3.55 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
18
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 17, 2024: (a) § hmc:file annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.
Show all
Hazardous
5
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 04, 2022: section 27-2005 adm code properly repair the broken or defective lock device at balcony door in the 1st room from east at south located at apt 4c, 4th story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Immediately hazardous
4
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Nov 04, 2022: hmc adm code: � 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 4c, 4th story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Missing information/filings
5
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 21, 2023: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (3)
2.88 stars
Over 1 year ago
Good building, awful management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great construction quality. Great thermal and noise insulation. Decent appliances. Mostly respectful neighbors.
Cons:
When we moved in, the building was clean and well-maintained. By the time we left a year and a half later in 2022, it was a mess. So glad we left.
Also get ready to have your rent skyrocket year after year. Ours started at $2300 and they wanted to increase it to $3700 at the end of the lease. Again, glad we left.
At one point, the main fire alarm went off, blaring loudly. Fire department rushed in and told us the owner had to disable it. It wasn't disabled for DAYS. Door got broken into and stayed that way for a few days. Smoke/CO2 detectors with low batteries beeping all over the common areas. Door to the roof never worked. Roof is dominated (and cluttered) by a couple neighbors who used to leave their door up there to do their business.
Some tenants (mostly young Bushwick crowd), put trash in front of the building or dump their stuff in the common areas. Owner never did anything.
Really hard to get ahold of management and maintenance, bordering on impossible. Too many numbers to call and poor communication between them.
Also get ready to have your rent skyrocket year after year. Ours started at $2300 and they wanted to increase it to $3700 at the end of the lease. Again, glad we left.
At one point, the main fire alarm went off, blaring loudly. Fire department rushed in and told us the owner had to disable it. It wasn't disabled for DAYS. Door got broken into and stayed that way for a few days. Smoke/CO2 detectors with low batteries beeping all over the common areas. Door to the roof never worked. Roof is dominated (and cluttered) by a couple neighbors who used to leave their door up there to do their business.
Some tenants (mostly young Bushwick crowd), put trash in front of the building or dump their stuff in the common areas. Owner never did anything.
Really hard to get ahold of management and maintenance, bordering on impossible. Too many numbers to call and poor communication between them.
Advice to owner:
Be more responsive to tenants. Fix your new building or it will look like a dump soon.
3.25 stars
Over 1 year ago
Beautiful building with nice apartments
Former Tenant
Pros:
The apartments are nice and well maintained with high end finishes.
Cons:
Roof is a mess, some neighbors let their pets use the shared space as a bathroom. Tenants leave trash right in front of building door.
Management DOES NOT RESPOND
Management DOES NOT RESPOND
Advice to owner:
Please stop making it so hard to get the smallest issues fixed.
3.62 stars
Over 2 years ago
Great building, less-than-competent facility management
Former Tenant
Pros:
The apartment itself is really nice.
The building is new.
Solid thermal and sound insulation.
Nice appliances (refrigerator, dishwasher, stove/oven)
The cleaning service they use always does a good job making sure the shared spaces are clean and that the trash is disposed of on a regular basis.
The building is new.
Solid thermal and sound insulation.
Nice appliances (refrigerator, dishwasher, stove/oven)
The cleaning service they use always does a good job making sure the shared spaces are clean and that the trash is disposed of on a regular basis.
Cons:
It takes forever to get something simple fixed. I know this isn't unique in this city, but it's almost laughable how you have to email and follow up for every single tiny little step in the process of getting something fixed.
There is little enforcement of tenants' use of the space. The rooftop is often a mess because the tenants upstairs just leave their stuff lying around and let their pets use the rooftop as a bathroom. Also, tenants dispose of items by just leaving them thrown on the street.
There is little enforcement of tenants' use of the space. The rooftop is often a mess because the tenants upstairs just leave their stuff lying around and let their pets use the rooftop as a bathroom. Also, tenants dispose of items by just leaving them thrown on the street.
Advice to owner:
You have a beautiful building! By investing in making sure that staff fix issues as they arise and by communicating and ebforcing expectations of cleanliness to tenants, this building would be perceived as a high quality apartment building. Right now, it is starting to look run down because of all the small issues that are accumulating and because of tenants' inappropriate use of the common spaces as storage and a living space for their pets.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here