4116 51 St,
Queens, NY 11377

42 Units

Built in 1931

6 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 3
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: No
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 5 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
2.07 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
21
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jul 06, 2024: § 27-2046.1 hmc: post a proper notice of carbon monoxide detecting device requirements, in a form approved by the commissioner, in a common area of a class a multiple dwelling near inspection certificate or provide notice to tenants in a private dwelling.
Show all
flag
Hazardous
44
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jul 06, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective latch assembly on vestibule door to public hall , 1st story
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
22
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jun 20, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code fire escape defective. replace with new the broken, defective and/or missing bent drop ladder 1st stack from south at building front at fire escape
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
J
John Neziraj
2.7(3)
Site Manager
1 Property42 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
D
Doreen Parker
2.7(3)
Shareholder
Head Officer
1 Property42 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
W
Wbr Management
2.7(3)
Agent
2 Properties90 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
S
Sharleen Moradof
2.7(3)
Shareholder
Officer
1 Property42 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (3)

Over 1 year ago
Seems ok on the outside... wait till you live here
Former Tenant
Pros:
Close to train station
Cons:
I heard a neighbor mention stolen mail (I too experience this) and open violations in this building, so I looked it up myself on HPD Online: 80+ violations. This speaks to the craftsmanship (or lack thereof) of the superintendent and whoever he lets into this building. The moment you walk up to the door, you'll see a grade of C issued by the city. Also plenty of instances where the garbage just sat and sat and sat... a haven for cockroaches. Not sure what management is doing, besides collecting sweet rent money (someone needs to give the real reason for having to pay more if I opt to pay online...) and mistreating tenants in underhanded ways. But don't worry. The truth always shows itself.
Advice to owner:
+100 to another review. Sell the building to people who actually care.
Over 2 years ago
Been here 6 years and it’s the best one yet
Former Tenant
Pros:
Proximity to subway, food, market/restaurants, laundry and quality of neighborhood life are wonderful. Feels safe, secure, quiet and have never had any issues. The super for me personally is responsive and has resolved all issues I’ve found in an appropriate manner. Management is fair with rent increases as it’s rent stabilized.
Cons:
No buzzer for first floor apartments to buzz anyone in, have had some roach problems in the summer months, and no matter what we do or unit we live in, there’s some kind of issue with the shower. Either not draining well, or non stop leaking.
Advice to owner:
I’ve enjoyed very much living in this building personally.
Over 2 years ago
Avoid at all costs
Former Tenant
Pros:
Convenience to Manhattan
Cons:
Building is dirty. Roach problems. Elevator is always out of order.
Advice to owner:
Sell the building to a landlord who cares. You’re horrible!
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here