4115 50 Avenue,
Queens, NY 11104

Claimed

95 Units

Built in 1942

6 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Available Listings In 4115 50 Avenue
no-listing
Don't miss out on any new listings!
Save buildings to your favorites and we'll let you know as soon as something becomes available.
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
674 complaints
See all complaints about this building in a rental report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Duration in the past 10 years.
Data last updated 4 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.08 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
2
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Aug 06, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code replace with new the missing concrete landing pad under drop ladder at 1st stack from east at south (building front) at fire escape
Show all
flag
Hazardous
3
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Aug 06, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective latch set at door at compactor closet, 2nd story, section at west
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
3
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Feb 18, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinges, at basement at laundry room
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
M
Morris Schrieber
2.7(6)
Head Officer
2 Properties187 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
A
Afrim Prejvkoraj
2.4(4)
Site Manager
1 Property95 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
R
Richard Eisenberg
3.4(20)
Officer
71 Properties3049 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 60
R
Rcr Management Group LLC
3.4(20)
Agent
71 Properties3049 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 62
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (4)

2 months ago
Awful Building - Constant issues with Electrical, Water, and Cockroaches
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice neighbors, good sense of community
Cons:
Completely unresponsive and unreliable management, poorly maintained building, constant leaks in roof, building is infested with cockroaches and other insects. Ongoing water quality and electrical issues.
Advice to owner:
Your building needs better management and significant capital improvements
6 months ago
Horrible management, rent stabilized
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great neighbors, considerate and nice.
Cons:
We had issues with roach infestation, in the apartment and basement where the communal laundry room is.
Few ceiling leakage that was only fixed on a surface level and they claimed to have visited for a mold inspection, but never came.
9 months ago
nice on the outside, but neighbors and pests are awful
Former Tenant
Pros:
-apartments are in decent shape for a pre-war building
-laundry in-building, pet-friendly, and elevators
-decently maintained
-super is helpful and relatively responsive
Cons:
-there are a handful of noisy neighbors in the building (at at least on our floor/side)
-some neighbors will leave garbage in the chute room, or animal waste in the hallway/elevator/lobby
-some dog owners will allow their dogs to bark incessantly if no one's home
-mice and roach problems are abundant, and property management doesn't address the issue with urgency
-basement doors are constantly open, making way for pests to easily enter the building
-apartment lacks a smoke detector
Advice to owner:
Please address building-wide/apartment concerns ASAP. Don't just sit on an issue. At the time of this review, the building is dealing with 2 class C building violations due to pests, and you're dragging your feet to address it. Don't just leave a sign up sheet and assume everyone knows what's going on. Actually contact surrounding apartments when there's an infestation and make it a point to get tenants to get serviced.
11 months ago
Prewar building and it shows
Former Tenant
Pros:
Large space, in-unit (and in building) laundry, pet friendly, safe and secure building, in building super
Cons:
Slightly renovated but needs repair, pipes are old and need replacing, roaches are a problem every summer
Advice to owner:
Pest control and repair of facilities