Once you submit an anonymous review for this building (or any other) you will gain access to the entire openigloo platform
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.23 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
10
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 29, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective fire retardant material at north, east and west walls at public hall, 6th story
Show all
Hazardous
7
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 21, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code fire escape defective. replace with new the broken, defective and/or missing broken gravity hook at the rear at fire escape at north
Show all
Immediately hazardous
5
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 21, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of mice in the entire apartment located at apt 2o, 2nd story, 3rd apartment from west at north
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
M
Morris Schrieber
2.9(8)
Head Officer•
2 Properties•187 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
A
Afrim Prejvkoraj
2.8(5)
Site Manager•
1 Property•95 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
R
Richard Eisenberg
3.2(119)
Officer•
71 Properties•3049 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 63
R
Rcr Management Group LLC
3.2(119)
Agent•
71 Properties•3049 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 63
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (5)
4.12 stars
2 months ago
Very poor noise isolation, kind neighbors and super
Former Tenant
Pros:
- Kind neighbors - Pet Friendly
Cons:
- Paper thin walls and floors - Building maintenance is lacking with all responsibilities put on a single person - Too much heat during winter
Advice to owner:
Hire additional building maintenance staff
1.75 stars
9 months ago
Awful Building - Constant issues with Electrical, Water, and Cockroaches
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice neighbors, good sense of community
Cons:
Completely unresponsive and unreliable management, poorly maintained building, constant leaks in roof, building is infested with cockroaches and other insects. Ongoing water quality and electrical issues.
Advice to owner:
Your building needs better management and significant capital improvements
3 stars
Over 1 year ago
Horrible management, rent stabilized
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great neighbors, considerate and nice.
Cons:
We had issues with roach infestation, in the apartment and basement where the communal laundry room is. Few ceiling leakage that was only fixed on a surface level and they claimed to have visited for a mold inspection, but never came.
2.38 stars
Over 1 year ago
nice on the outside, but neighbors and pests are awful
Former Tenant
Pros:
-apartments are in decent shape for a pre-war building -laundry in-building, pet-friendly, and elevators -decently maintained -super is helpful and relatively responsive
Cons:
-there are a handful of noisy neighbors in the building (at at least on our floor/side) -some neighbors will leave garbage in the chute room, or animal waste in the hallway/elevator/lobby -some dog owners will allow their dogs to bark incessantly if no one's home -mice and roach problems are abundant, and property management doesn't address the issue with urgency -basement doors are constantly open, making way for pests to easily enter the building -apartment lacks a smoke detector
Advice to owner:
Please address building-wide/apartment concerns ASAP. Don't just sit on an issue. At the time of this review, the building is dealing with 2 class C building violations due to pests, and you're dragging your feet to address it. Don't just leave a sign up sheet and assume everyone knows what's going on. Actually contact surrounding apartments when there's an infestation and make it a point to get tenants to get serviced.
2.62 stars
Over 1 year ago
Prewar building and it shows
Former Tenant
Pros:
Large space, in-unit (and in building) laundry, pet friendly, safe and secure building, in building super
Cons:
Slightly renovated but needs repair, pipes are old and need replacing, roaches are a problem every summer
Advice to owner:
Pest control and repair of facilities
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here