37-10 Crescent Street,Queens, NY 11101
57 Units
•Built in 2015
•7 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Available Listings In 37-10 Crescent Street
Long Island City
37-10 Crescent Street #3E
$4,620
3 beds•2 baths•Est. Jan 2025
Future
Long Island City
37-10 Crescent Street #PH2
$4,365
2 beds•1 bath•Est. Apr 2025
Future
Long Island City
37-10 Crescent Street #2I
$4,244
2 beds•1 bath•Est. May 2025
Future
Long Island City
37-10 Crescent Street #5G
$3,921
2 beds•1 bath•Est. Jan 2025
Future
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
57 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.22 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
4
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 05, 2021: section 27-2053 adm code post sign on wall of entrance story bearing name, address including apartment number if any, and telephone number of superintendent, janitor or housekeeper.
Show all
Hazardous
4
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Mar 12, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code provide security in the event of a power outage by means of an acceptable heavy duty lock and latch set at street entrance door to building , 1st story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
5
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Mar 12, 2024: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code remove the illegal fastening double cylinder lock installed on street entrance door to building , 1st story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
C
Charles Dubroff
3.1(6)
Officer•
1 Property•57 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
S
Sheldon Stein
3.1(6)
Head Officer•
1 Property•57 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
R
Ranger Sagamore Crescent Owner, LLC
3.1(6)
Corporate Owner•
1 Property•57 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
P
Paul Borekjian
3.1(6)
Site Manager•
1 Property•57 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (6)
3.5 stars
Over 1 year ago
It was just okay.
Former Tenant
Pros:
It's a nice building with pretty good views. It's clean, quiet, and relatively safe.
Cons:
The company that owns the building is pretty unhelpful and a little rude. It's also unnecessarily expensive for what it is.
Advice to owner:
Add more amenities and be kind to the residents.
3.88 stars
Over 2 years ago
Mediocre
Former Tenant
Pros:
Modern amenities, common spaces
Cons:
Trash smell, common areas being timed
Advice to owner:
Open up common areas
2.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
Co-living an experiment gone wrong
Former Tenant
Pros:
Well-constructed building. I hardly ever heard the neighbors above or to the sides.
Cons:
The most incompetent property management possible. It took them 3 months to return my security deposit too.
1 stars
Over 2 years ago
Stay Away from this Building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Management (Common) does not respond to any of your emails, tickets, etc. There is no cleaning of the common areas, laundry rooms (washers and dryers), garbage rooms, etc. This is against all sanitation regulations, not to mention for Covid 19. This building was clean and well maintained prior to Common. Since they took over, the living conditions here at The Lanes are despicable. Do not live here.
Cons:
Do not live here
Advice to owner:
This is unacceptable.
4 stars
Over 2 years ago
2018-2020 Tenant with the Lanes
Former Tenant
Pros:
- Brand new
- Rent-stabilized and fairly priced rooms
- 2nd floor apartments all have big private terraces
- Nice gym
- Two nice lounges
- Nice furnished roof with beautiful view
- Rent-stabilized and fairly priced rooms
- 2nd floor apartments all have big private terraces
- Nice gym
- Two nice lounges
- Nice furnished roof with beautiful view
Cons:
- In 2020, an influx of noisy tenants arrived who threw parties even on weeknights
- Certain groups of tenants and their guests were constantly in the roof and hogging it
- Management refused to remove a tenant who had Covid that refused to move to a different unit to quarantine, i had to work with them on my own effort to get a new unit separate from this dangerous individual
- A bit of a long walk to subways
- No coffee shops in the immediate area for the 2 years I was there, and only one supermarket (shoddy Key Foods)
- Certain groups of tenants and their guests were constantly in the roof and hogging it
- Management refused to remove a tenant who had Covid that refused to move to a different unit to quarantine, i had to work with them on my own effort to get a new unit separate from this dangerous individual
- A bit of a long walk to subways
- No coffee shops in the immediate area for the 2 years I was there, and only one supermarket (shoddy Key Foods)
Advice to owner:
Screen tenants for behavior and make it clear that quiet hours are 10pm inward on weeknights
Remove dangerous tenants immediately
Remove dangerous tenants immediately
3.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
Nice place to live
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice building, great rooftop view
Cons:
Young crowd - rooftop will have parties
Advice to owner: