NYC Buildings
/
Queens
/
Astoria
/
31-11 Crescent Street

31-11 Crescent Street,
Queens, NY 11106

27 Units

Built in 1927

4 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.03 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
1
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Feb 14, 2019: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department all peeling paint surfaces in the 2nd room from east at north, the private hallway located at apt c5, 3rd story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
flag
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
L
Ljupco Jordanov
3.3(4)
Site Manager
1 Property27 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 1
A
Atlas Management
3.3(4)
Agent
4 Properties48 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
A
Aeon Capital LLC
3.3(4)
Owner
Corporate Owner
10 Properties267 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 5
M
Michael Stefanakis
3.3(4)
Officer
5 Properties57 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (4)

9 months ago
Beware of Haphazard Repairs and Hamburger Hour(s)
Former Tenant
Pros:
Supers are nice and want to help. The building is quiet, pet friendly, and everyone generally keeps to themselves. Fellow tenants will leave items in the lobby to give away to others.
Cons:
-Beware of the primary leasing agent for the building, Spiro, who likes to price gauge potential tenants. He's also known to lie about noisy apartment construction renovations in the building, saying that the construction will be done sooner than realistic. He might be related to the building owners, to make things more convoluted.
-Lease agreements are old and rife with miscommunications. It's recommended that you ask for inclusions and exclusions to the lease to avoid any potential issues.
-Rent is paid by mailing checks. Rent checks are sometimes given to the tenants late.
-The contractors who repair and renovate the building are nice but their work is sloppy at best. A tenant had a stove hood installed (after waiting three months for the hood to arrive), the hood had to be replaced because it was the wrong size. Once the hood was installed, the contractors applied layers of sloppy plaster to adhere it to the ceiling.
-Appliances are decent but not guaranteed to be installed correctly. My washing machine isn't secured to the kitchen counter.
-One of the two communal washer and dryer are usually broken down.

-Hamburger Hour: One of the tenants on the first floor is known to cook what smells like a massive amount of ground beef once a day, usually in the afternoon. This causes the entire building to fill with smoke and smell of grilled meat. The closer you are to the ground floor, the higher the chances you'll be coughing and need to buy a fan. I bought a very expensive Dyson fat to combat the smells and smoke and it still doesn't seem like enough some days. I've asked the tenant directly and although they understood and were kind about the ask, it hasn't stopped the smoke and smells. The Supers are more than aware but the building owners/landlords don't act on the complaints. It's hard to be culturally sensitive to what the smells/smoke may derive from when the inconvenience can be so inconvenient and unhealthy on a DAILY basis. Have 311 on speed dial if you must.
Advice to owner:
Address the complaints of tenants or the 311 fines will continue to pile up.
Over 1 year ago
Lived here for a couple years
Former Tenant
Pros:
Management is responsive
Cons:
Loud neighbors and pests
Over 3 years ago
Great Building!
Former Tenant
Pros:
Usually quiet, clean and well maintained.
Cons:
Even though they installed security camera that hasn’t help stopping package thefts.
Advice to owner:
Beautifully maintained.
Perhaps install package lockers for the tenants?
Over 3 years ago
Could be a lot better
Former Tenant
Pros:
Convenient location and most neighbors are very nice
Cons:
It takes way too long for management to address problems. Communication is also really bad re: construction in the building and noise.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here