NYC Buildings
/
Queens
/
Astoria
/
31-75 29 Street
Astoria

31-75 29 Street,
Queens, NY 11106

48 Units

•

Built in 1928

•

6 Floors

4.8(1)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 1 week ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.14 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    2
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Apr 09, 2019: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak at ceiling in the foyer located at apt f4, 6th story, 2nd apartment from north at east
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    3
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Oct 27, 2018: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair the broken or defective counter balance lower sash window in the bathroom located at apt e6, 5th story, 2nd apartment from east at south
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    1
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Feb 18, 2019: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt e6, 5th story, 4th apartment from east at south
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    1
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    Dec 02, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    M
    Michael Pafitis
    4.8(1)
    Owner•
    Head Officer•
    1 Property•48 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 0
    M
    Mhp Realty LLC
    4.8(1)
    Owner•
    Corporate Owner•
    1 Property•48 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 0
    A
    Aramiz Rodoncic
    4.8(1)
    Site Manager•
    1 Property•48 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 0
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (1)

    Over 2 years ago
    comfortable, clean, good place to live
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    super lives in building; trash chute; elevator; diligent pest control/prevention
    Cons:
    super did not always respond right away; the building was not dog-friendly on paper, but there were so many dogs in the building that it should have been dog-friendly
    Advice to owner:
    make it a dog-friendly building
    Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
    OR
    Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here