25-60 33 Street,Queens, NY 11102
16 Units
•Built in 1927
•4 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: No
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
16 complaints
Get rental reports for more information
You Will Get:
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Duration in the past 10 years.
Data last updated 3 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.87 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
9
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
May 03, 2024: § 27-2053 adm code post sign on wall of entrance story bearing name, address including apartment number if any, and telephone number of superintendent, janitor or housekeeper. at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Hazardous
9
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
May 03, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: refit door to west yard at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
11
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jul 05, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinges at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 24, 2023: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
A
Andreas Nikolakopoulos
2.4(2)
Shareholder•
Agent•
1 Property•16 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
M
Maria Nikolakopoulos
2.4(2)
Site Manager•
Officer•
Head Officer•
1 Property•16 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
P
Panagiotis I, Inc.
2.4(2)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
1 Property•16 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
2.62 stars
1 week ago
Good Bones, Deteriorating Slowly
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building was clearly at one time nice and you can still tell in some of the older features. The ceilings are high and there are a lot of windows. My unit had old fashioned glass doorknobs (on some doors). The units are relatively affordable and roomy. It's close to both the Astoria Blvd and 30th Ave subway stops. I love the neighborhood.
From talking with neighbors, I'd say most were attracted to the apartment by the building. Most of our conversations went something like, "x and y is annoying, but I love the building!"
From talking with neighbors, I'd say most were attracted to the apartment by the building. Most of our conversations went something like, "x and y is annoying, but I love the building!"
Cons:
The building is extremely poorly maintained. When something breaks, it is either not fixed or fixed in the cheapest way possible. Owner is nice but very slow to resolve problems. There are many cockroaches in the building in the summertime and the exterminator was called infrequently. There is a package thief who must live in the building (their work continued even after the locks were changed). There are a lot of things that are just a little annoying and will never be fixed.
Would I recommend it to a friend? That depends - I think it offers good value for the price range. If that outweighs the occasional roach (1-2 per month in summer) and other bugs, gross communal spaces, and recurrent package theft, go for it. Honestly, to me it's worth it, but if I could afford somewhere better, I would move somewhere better.
Would I recommend it to a friend? That depends - I think it offers good value for the price range. If that outweighs the occasional roach (1-2 per month in summer) and other bugs, gross communal spaces, and recurrent package theft, go for it. Honestly, to me it's worth it, but if I could afford somewhere better, I would move somewhere better.
Advice to owner:
Put some money back into the building, please!
2.25 stars
Over 1 year ago
Old and run down
Former Tenant
Pros:
Was cheap and close to everything
Cons:
Pre-war bot maintained well. Water leak from above apartment nit fixed property and mold started growing on walls
Advice to owner:
Fix stuff