NYC Buildings
/
Queens
/
Astoria
/
32-75 46 Street

32-75 46 Street,
Queens, NY 11103

3 Units

Built in 1930

3 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
7.66 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
9
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jun 29, 2017: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department the window frame in the bathroom located at apt 1, 1st story
Show all
flag
Hazardous
9
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jun 28, 2017: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak at ceiling in the bathroom located at apt 1, 1st story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
4
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jul 17, 2017: § 27-2033 adm code post notice, in form approved by the department, stating the name and location of the person designated by the owner to have key to buildings heating system .. at public hall, 1st story
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Dec 02, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
W
Wilfred Palomino
2.1(2)
Owner
Agent
2 Properties3 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
W
William Palomino
2.1(2)
Site Manager
2 Properties3 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
P
Palomino, Wilfred
2.1(2)
Owner
2 Properties3 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (2)

Over 2 years ago
Good looking at face value but falling apart
Former Tenant
Pros:
The apartment is a duplex and spacious. Close to the M and R line 46th street station.
Cons:
Poor heat, infested with roaches, neighbors are loud and disruptive, landlord makes you feel like you’re inconveniencing him when you ask him to fix something. He will do whatever he can to not give your security deposit back. Rent is far too high for the space co soldering the state of the apartment.
Advice to owner:
Lower your rent to make the space more appealing otherwise people will keep leaving on you. Fix what’s broken.
Over 3 years ago
Cheapskate. Building is falling apart.
Former Tenant
Pros:
A lot of space, but the whole building needs work.
Cons:
Lack of upkeep over the years is evident. Water leaked from third floor apartment into second floor bathroom multiple times. Roaches and ants. Neighbors were loud, smoked weed at all hours, domestic violence issues that the landlord ignored. Broken door handles, clogged pipes, mold, and lack of heat are some of the problems to name a few. Cheapskate ran off with our security deposit.
Advice to owner:
Knock the place down and rebuild since it’s fallen into such poor condition.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here