37-19 Ditmars Blvd,
Queens, NY 11105

35 Units

Built in 1927

4 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Available Listings In 37-19 Ditmars Blvd
unit
Ditmars-Steinway
21-80 38 Street #C8
$4,042
3 beds2 bathsEst. Dec 2024
Future
unit
Ditmars-Steinway
21-80 38 Street #C-8
$4,042
3 beds2 bathsEst. Dec 2024
Future
unit
Ditmars-Steinway
21-80 38 Street #Unit D1
$4,042
3 beds1 bathEst. Mar 2025
Future
unit
Ditmars-Steinway
21-80 38 Street #4D1
$4,042
2 beds1 bathEst. Mar 2025
Future
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
29 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.77 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
17
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 12, 2024: (a) § hmc:file annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.
Show all
flag
Hazardous
8
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
May 24, 2021: section 27-2005 adm code repair the roof so that it will not leak at the ceiling at public hall stairs, 4th story, section ''east''
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
2
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jan 19, 2024: § 27-2033 adm code provide ready access to buildings heating system boiler room door at center court yard at boiler room
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
S
Samir Hodzic
4.4(4)
Site Manager
1 Property35 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
R
Rajmattie Persuad
3.4(9)
Head Officer
2 Properties77 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
K
Krcm Astoria Portfolio Corp
3.5(15)
Corporate Owner
3 Properties119 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
M
Michael Singh
3.6(21)
Head Officer
4 Properties157 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (4)

20 hours ago
Nice building, nice neighbors. Owner is not responsive to messages.
Former Tenant
Pros:
-Great location
-Clean
-Great noise isolation from other neighbors
-We had a situation with mice but they were very responsive and the issue was resolved after that.
Cons:
-Management is not responsive at all.
Over 1 year ago
No Problems Here
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice, responsive maintenance guy and landlord as well as pest control. Not too loud and nice area.
Cons:
There is a bird that starts making noise at 6am and it’s extremely loud
Over 1 year ago
Nice little apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building management was great. On-site and easily accessible.
Cons:
Noisy neighbors. Ended up moving early.
Over 2 years ago
Love living here
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location is prime - building is always super clean - apartments get good light - Jim is super nice
Cons:
No roof deck - package system needs to be improved (they have recently taken steps to do so, so we’ll see how it goes from now on)