26-01 24 Ave,Queens, NY 11102
6 Units
•Built in 1931
•3 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 day ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
1
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Nov 13, 2017: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department all peeling paint surfaces in the kitchen , the 4th room from east at south, the 4th room from east at north located at apt 2a, 2nd story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Hazardous
2
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jan 14, 2018: § 27-2040 adm code install and maintain sufficient light or lights of at least 100 watts incandescent or equivalent each, to light adequately from sunset to sunrise the ... yard
Show all
Immediately hazardous
3
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Nov 13, 2017: § 27-2056.6 adm code - correct the lead-based paint hazard - paint that tested positive for lead content and that is peeling or on a deteriorated subsurface - using work practices set forth in 28 rcny §11-06(b)(2) south wall, east wall in the foyer located at apt 2a, 2nd story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
K
Kol Mriza
3.8(2)
Site Manager•
1 Property•6 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
V
Vendome Property Management Inc
3.3(4)
Agent•
11 Properties•113 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
V
Vendome, Giuseppa
3.8(2)
Owner•
1 Property•6 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
G
Giuseppa Vendome
3.8(2)
Owner•
3 Properties•15 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
4 stars
8 months ago
Close to park, family friendly area, well maintained, noisy neighbors
Former Tenant
Pros:
Close to the park and the area is very family friendly. The building was well maintained and the super constantly kept it clean.
Cons:
Neighbors were very noisy and disrespectful. The walls are kind of thin and my neighbors constantly played their TV extremely loud, played music late at night, and caused other unreasonably loud sounds.
Advice to owner:
Continue to maintain property but enforce noise complaints.
3.62 stars
Over 1 year ago
Attractive on the outside
Former Tenant
Pros:
At the time I moved in, the owner lived in the neighborhood. Regular exterminator, no bug problems. External parts of the property were kept up nicely. Location is good, within walking distance of Astoria Park and the subway. It *was* a nice building with good neighbors and low turnover.
Cons:
By the time I left, the sons who live elsewhere were the ones involved in managing property. They spent money to pretty up foyer with fancy chandelier, but not to fix upstairs neighbor’s bathroom that was leaking into my apartment. All the apartments were 2 bedrooms. Now they appear to have been converted to 3 bedrooms (according to StreetEasy) and have been given the gray decor flip treatment along with a bump in rent. Upgrades done in my apartment appeared to have been done hastily, with shoddy workmanship.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here