NYC Buildings
/
Queens
/
Woodside
/
39-26 62 Street
Woodside

39-26 62 Street,
Queens, NY 11377

25 Units

•

Built in 1927

•

5 Floors

2.6(1)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 6 days ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.4 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    2
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Oct 24, 2017: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department the 1st door frame from east at south wall in the private hallway located at apt 2a, 2nd story, 2nd apartment from north at east
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    4
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Nov 03, 2018: § 27-2046.1 hmc: repair or replace the carbon monoxide detecting device(s). defective in the entire apartment located at apt 4b, 4th story, 1st apartment from north at east
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    3
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Jan 06, 2020: section 27-2056.4 adm code- correct failure to notify occupants and/or to investigate lead-based paint hazards.
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    1
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    Dec 02, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    R
    Roula Kapetanos Panas
    2.6(1)
    Owner•
    Corporate Owner•
    Agent•
    3 Properties•83 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 2
    W
    62 Windsor LLC
    2.6(1)
    Owner•
    Corporate Owner•
    Agent•
    2 Properties•45 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 2
    P
    Peter Panas
    2.6(1)
    Shareholder•
    Head Officer•
    3 Properties•83 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 2
    R
    Raul Cuevas
    2.6(1)
    Site Manager•
    1 Property•25 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 0
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (1)

    Over 3 years ago
    Good building, bad neighbors and management
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    The building is well maintained with a good super
    Cons:
    they don't deal with big issues that come up like frozen pipes or insane neighbors. very hands off
    Advice to owner:
    Deal with the issues in your own effing building
    Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
    OR
    Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here