35-05 94 Street,Queens, NY 11372
72 Units
•Built in 1934
•6 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 3
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 weeks ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
3.09 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
41
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Dec 02, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department all walls and ceiling in the 1st room from north at east located at apt 6e, 6th story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Hazardous
77
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Dec 02, 2024: § 27-2045 adm code repair or replace the smoke detector missing in the entire apartment located at apt 6e, 6th story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Immediately hazardous
105
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Dec 04, 2024: § 27-2033 adm code provide ready access to buildings heating system door locked at cellar
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
T
37-37 88th Street, LLC
3.1(218)
Corporate Owner•
271 Properties•10757 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 519
B
Brian Garland
1.9(4)
Agent•
2 Properties•144 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
M
Maggie Mccormiuck
3.1(186)
Head Officer•
248 Properties•9643 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 475
T
94th & 95th Street, Jh, LLC
2.3(7)
Corporate Owner•
3 Properties•204 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (4)
1.5 stars
Over 1 year ago
Never move here
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nothing no pros
Cons:
Drug addicts stabbing people and stealing packages, horribly infested with roaches and mice, management company never responds to emails or complaints. Do not move here under any circumstances
Advice to owner:
Get your shit together
1.5 stars
Over 1 year ago
Please read before renting any apartment from A&E
Former Tenant
Pros:
NONE
NOT ONE PRO
NOT ONE PRO
Cons:
Everything! Go online and read their reviews before you rent from this management company. They raise your rent claiming “repairs need to be done” and nothing is ever repaired. Laundry rooms are disgusting. They don’t ever respond to calls or emails. Management does not care for these building. If you don’t mind the occasional homeless/ drugged out person sleeping in your front apartment door, this is your place.
Advice to owner:
Please pay attention to your apartment buildings.
2.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
Need more heat in the apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
Area is good
Cons:
Lack of communication.
Advice to owner:
Respond faster to maintenance.
2.38 stars
Over 3 years ago
High rent for low quality
Former Tenant
Pros:
Move-out and getting a short lease extension was easy. Kitchen was a nice size.
Cons:
Halls and garbage room were always dirty.
We had an extensive problem with drug use in the stairwell-trash, urine soaked clothes, broken drug paraphernalia left in the stairwell.
Roaches were a problem no matter how clean we kept the apartment. Management offers bimonthly extermination but the extermination only helped the problem for a bit.
Water pressure varied and the water would run brown for several seconds several times a week…even tho though the landlord made plumbing improvements that warranted a rent increase.
We had an extensive problem with drug use in the stairwell-trash, urine soaked clothes, broken drug paraphernalia left in the stairwell.
Roaches were a problem no matter how clean we kept the apartment. Management offers bimonthly extermination but the extermination only helped the problem for a bit.
Water pressure varied and the water would run brown for several seconds several times a week…even tho though the landlord made plumbing improvements that warranted a rent increase.
Advice to owner:
It’s clear that you are doing the bare minimum to keep the building in shape while raising the rent. Your tenants may not be wealthy people, but that doesn’t mean they deserve to live in poorly maintained building.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here