A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.42 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
5
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 05, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at ceiling in the 4th room from north located at apt b2, 2nd story, 1st apartment from south at west , section at west
Show all
Hazardous
3
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 05, 2024: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak at ceiling in the bathroom located at apt b2, 2nd story, 1st apartment from south at west , section at west
Show all
Immediately hazardous
10
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 05, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt b2, 2nd story, 1st apartment from south at west , section at west
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
B
Bruce Wolinetz
2.9(5)
Officer•
31 Properties•459 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
S
Stephen Wolinetz
2(1)
Agent•
1 Property•42 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
B
Bruce Wolinetz
2(1)
Head Officer•
2 Properties•46 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
S
Steven Goodman
2(1)
Officer•
2 Properties•46 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (1)
2 stars
Over 2 years ago
Worst will be an understatement
Former Tenant
Pros:
Next to subway, bus, groceries, restaurants.
Cons:
The building authorities barely does any maintenance, dirty elevator and hallway, bad heating system, poor insulation resulting excessive heat in summer and cold in winter, dirty iron water, old heating system, building super can not speak English & denies to help if requested, and of course high rent.
Advice to owner:
I wish I could tell them ‘F$@&k off to their face’ but then I need to buy my own house for that… ;(
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here