NYC Buildings
/
Queens
/
Corona
/
96-02 57 Avenue

96-02 57 Avenue,
Queens, NY 11368

222 Units

Built in 1962

16 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 24
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: Yes
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Available Listings In 96-02 57 Avenue
unit
Corona
96-02 57 Avenue #LON18K
$3,542
3 beds2 bathsEst. Apr 2025
Future
unit
Corona
96-02 57 Avenue #LON18D
$3,419
3 beds2 bathsEst. Apr 2025
Future
unit
Corona
96-02 57 Avenue #6J
$2,992
1 bed1 bathEst. Mar 2025
Future
unit
Corona
96-02 57 Avenue #LON06E
$2,847
1 bed1 bathEst. May 2025
Future
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
286 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 day ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.27 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
3
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Aug 22, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at north wall at public hall 4th story
Show all
flag
Hazardous
27
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 07, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective latch assembly on compactor closet door, labeled as 5th floor at public hall, 4th story
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
30
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Nov 07, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective latch on compactor closet, labeled as 5th floor at public hall, 4th story
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
D
David Bernhardt
3.2(17)
Head Officer
16 Properties3446 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 416
E
Estates NY Real Estate Services LLC
3.3(138)
Agent
85 Properties10599 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 615
L
London Equities Holding LP
2.8(2)
Shareholder
1 Property222 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 24
M
Mandalay Leasing LP
3.3(22)
Corporate Owner
19 Properties4147 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 465
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (2)

Over 2 years ago
Too expensive
Former Tenant
Pros:
The maintenance workers are all amazing and kind. They do their jobs great and are always willing to help.
Cons:
They charge for water which is ridiculous. It’s super expensive to live here and they should pay back tenants money for amenities like the pool since it wasn’t even used in the summer. Also there are issues with heat in the winter. The walls in the apartments are so thin. You can hear everything happening in the next room.
Advice to owner:
None this is corporate they definitely don’t care
Over 2 years ago
Management is bad
Former Tenant
Pros:
Views are good
Cons:
Amenities are poor and not worth the rent. Many apartments are not even renovated and very old.