6260 99 Street,
Queens, NY 11374

419 Units

Built in 1960

16 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 10
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 5 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.38 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
15
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Nov 16, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department ceiling in the kitchen located at apt 627, 4th story, 1st apartment from west at north , section ''625-627'', at north
Show all
flag
Hazardous
87
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Dec 03, 2024: § 27-2045 adm code repair or replace the smoke detector defective in the entire apartment located at apt 622, 6th story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
60
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Dec 10, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinges in the entrance located at apt 1722, 14th story, 1st apartment from north at east , section at north
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Dec 02, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
S
Silverstone Property Group, LLC
3.6(84)
Agent
50 Properties1641 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 24
J
Julia Rodriguez
3.8(70)
Head Officer
37 Properties1408 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 19
V
Vesa Naka
2.6(10)
Site Manager
1 Property419 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 9
T
62-60 99th Street Owner Ii LLC
3.3(12)
Corporate Owner
2 Properties463 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 12
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (10)

2 months ago
Don’t do it
Former Tenant
Pros:
Balcony view and all the doormen.
Cons:
No gas for over 2 months, no hot water for 2 days now, mouse in kitchen and elevator breaks down every Sunday for days.
Advice to owner:
Replacement of elevators, boiler, and serious extermination of mice, building is infested
2 months ago
A hotmess express
Former Tenant
Pros:
- Spacious apartments with massive closets
- Laundry in building
- Convenience to the subway and close to shops/restaurants
- Packages are safe and kept in a room for you
- Some of the doormen are nice
Cons:
- Pests are out of control (can literally hear mice in the walls) and see roaches around the building often
- Elevators are always broken
- Supers and landlords are not responsive and ignore you + the problems you have for months
Advice to owner:
Resign effective immediately and hire someone who’s actually dedicated to taking care of the building
5 months ago
"Luxury" masked in aging building
Former Tenant
Pros:
- Doorman & mail service
- Plenty of laundry machines, never had a problem
- Fresh and modern appliances
Cons:
- Water would constantly shut off without warning
- Huge roach problems, especially in the summer
- Gym is never cleaned, near garbage area aka roaches
- Balcony was never used due to pigeons constantly flying in and out of them
9 months ago
Not Terrible but meh neighborhood
Former Tenant
Pros:
Big apartments, not reasonable rents
Cons:
the super is an asshole. the neighborhood also sucks but whatever
Advice to owner:
i think having a super who isn’t so rude would be a great start
10 months ago
Problems from week 1
Former Tenant
Pros:
There are many employees constantly working on the upkeep and cleanliness of common areas. The doormen are friendly and helpful and manage packages safely. Overall on-premise staff are a great perk (if possibly the only perk) of living here. Neighbors are generally quiet and keep to themselves.
Cons:
Management changes hands often and all companies have been inattentive and ineffective. The building is older and it shows in the units, even the renovated ones. We have had ongoing flooding and water damage (which has led to mold and property damage), severe pest issues, and broken appliances that take months to remedy. Elevators are far too few for the size of the building and often break or are monopolized by maintenance staff. Management is disorganized and inefficient in correspondence and turnover for admin seems pretty frequent.
Advice to owner:
Increase efficiency in responding to tenants and decrease outward apathy towards people who pay you tens of thousands of dollars a year
Over 1 year ago
Just Like Living in the Projects and Shady Management Company--Bronstein
Former Tenant
Pros:
Convenient to mass transit and major highways.
Cons:
Elevators always breaking down and super who tries to blame the tenants for the elevator problems. Lack of communication from management when ALL of the elevators are out of service, which happens frequently. New management company Bronstein is unresponsive to tenants phone calls and they try to charge tenants the wrong rent and won't fix it without a major confrontation. Management is moving in people from shelters. No security in the building. Revolving door with maintenance staff who double as doormen.
Advice to owner:
Stop skimping on major repairs and invest in new elevators, and straighten out the staff who work in the rental office.
Over 2 years ago
Very high rent very poor service.
Former Tenant
Pros:
I like the space of the apartment and the layout. I liked my balcony.
Cons:
The area where they kept the garbage is disgusting and dirty. Washing machines are not cleaned enough. It’s a revolving door of different maintenance people all the time. Very high rent but not close to the service that should come with the cost. The elevator service on the northside has been horrific with one being down in long periods of time or too often.
Advice to owner:
Start making sure that when tickets are put in for service that they are followed through and completed. Jobs are left half done or done improperly. Your maintenance people should be able to communicate with your tenants reasonably. The area where all the garbage is piled up is the cause of the rats and roaches crawling outside on that north end of the building. Upgrade the elevators so we stop having so many issues with them.
Over 2 years ago
its ok
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good views and kitchen renovations
Cons:
Elevators always breakdown and they call it a luxury building when its really not.
Advice to owner:
Invest in new elevators
Over 2 years ago
The Drake
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building has many amenities such as a gym, laundry, pet bath, small dog run. The apartment I rented was remodeled and modern.
Cons:
Maintenance requests took very long.
Over 3 years ago
Elevator doesn’t work half the time and horrible management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Rent is affordable. The location is ok.
Cons:
The elevators doesn’t work almost 5 days in a month. The tenant have to use the stairs to go to their home which makes it hard for elders. There is a lot of water leak. Lastly the management is horrible.
Advice to owner:
Bring a team who can manage this building. Please hire people who are responsible and are willing to act if the tenant have any issue. One of the super have a rude attitude like he is working here for free
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here