NYC Buildings
/
Queens
/
Forest Hills
/
102-50 62 Road
Forest Hills

102-50 62 Road,
Queens, NY 11375

102 Units

•

Built in 1956

•

6 Floors

2.1(3)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 5
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Available Listings In 102-50 62 Road
    unit
    Forest Hills
    102-50 62 Road #5L
    $3,228
    2 beds•1 bath•Est. Mar 2025
    Future
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 2 weeks ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.12 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    2
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Oct 15, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at ceiling and east wall in the 3rd room from north at east located at apt 7g, 6th story, 1st apartment from north at east , section at south
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    7
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Dec 07, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective latch assembly on door to stairway x labelled 7 floor at public hall, 6th story, section ''a-h'', at west
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    4
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Dec 09, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective 1st door leading to north labeled 'service entrance' at public hall at cellar, section ''a-h'', at west
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    R
    Richard Stone Lefrak Trust
    2.1(3)
    Shareholder•
    2 Properties•172 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 4
    N
    Nautilus Realty Limited Partnership
    3.2(118)
    Corporate Owner•
    66 Properties•6303 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 373
    E
    Estates NY Real Estate Services LLC
    3.3(139)
    Agent•
    85 Properties•10599 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 880
    E
    Elm Leasing Limited Liability Company
    2(5)
    Corporate Owner•
    2 Properties•178 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 20
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (3)

    Over 1 year ago
    Not worth the rent
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Nothing good beside elevator
    Cons:
    Packages always stolen, bugs everywhere
    Advice to owner:
    I
    Over 3 years ago
    Worst Building to live in
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    None at all, no heat, pay for water, rude loud neighbors
    Cons:
    maintenance is horrible
    Advice to owner:
    Fix the issues
    Over 3 years ago
    Was expecting a better living based off neighborhood
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    The pros of this building is the quietness, no loitering in and around building, tenants come and go , no heavy traffic in building.
    Cons:
    The cons of the building is the superintendent, he is very lazy, lives in building but doesn’t troubleshoot issues in building when need be. Also, the old wood flooring are very loud and need a serious renovation. Walls are paper thin. Elevator is very small was a job and a half moving in, had to climb steps with bed etc because elevator is so tiny. Also, apartments don’t come with AC units in wall , you have to buy your own acs plus pay to get the brackets installed as well as a monthly fee for each AC. Don’t even know if this is legal. Lastly, management is not responsive and if so they’re very standoffish but are down your throat if you’re a tad bit on late, trying their best to evict you. I’m not done with my first year lease but I’m afraid to see the rent hike since they said my apartment is not subject to rent stabilization even tho this building is.
    Advice to owner:
    This is a very old building with a need for renovation, please stop pocketing off of the new tenants who are paying trip the rent to keep the building functioning. Have a little bit more protection for newer tenants especially during a pandemic.

    Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
    OR
    Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here