102-50 62 Road,Queens, NY 11375
102 Units
•Built in 1956
•6 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 5
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Available Listings In 102-50 62 Road
Forest Hills
102-50 62 Road #5L
$3,228
2 beds•1 bath•Est. Mar 2025
Future
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
138 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.07 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
2
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 15, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at ceiling and east wall in the 3rd room from north at east located at apt 7g, 6th story, 1st apartment from north at east , section at south
Show all
Hazardous
4
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 15, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective lower sash spring balance at south wall window in the 3rd room from north at east located at apt 7g, 6th story, 1st apartment from north at east , section at south
Show all
Immediately hazardous
2
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 12, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of mice in the entire apartment located at apt 1f, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
R
Richard Stone Lefrak Trust
2.1(3)
Shareholder•
2 Properties•172 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 4
N
Nautilus Realty Limited Partnership
3.2(117)
Corporate Owner•
66 Properties•6303 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 363
E
Estates NY Real Estate Services LLC
3.3(138)
Agent•
85 Properties•10599 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 615
E
Elm Leasing Limited Liability Company
2(5)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•178 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 14
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (3)
2 stars
Over 1 year ago
Not worth the rent
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nothing good beside elevator
Cons:
Packages always stolen, bugs everywhere
Advice to owner:
I
1.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Worst Building to live in
Former Tenant
Pros:
None at all, no heat, pay for water, rude loud neighbors
Cons:
maintenance is horrible
Advice to owner:
Fix the issues
2.88 stars
Over 2 years ago
Was expecting a better living based off neighborhood
Former Tenant
Pros:
The pros of this building is the quietness, no loitering in and around building, tenants come and go , no heavy traffic in building.
Cons:
The cons of the building is the superintendent, he is very lazy, lives in building but doesn’t troubleshoot issues in building when need be. Also, the old wood flooring are very loud and need a serious renovation. Walls are paper thin. Elevator is very small was a job and a half moving in, had to climb steps with bed etc because elevator is so tiny. Also, apartments don’t come with AC units in wall , you have to buy your own acs plus pay to get the brackets installed as well as a monthly fee for each AC. Don’t even know if this is legal. Lastly, management is not responsive and if so they’re very standoffish but are down your throat if you’re a tad bit on late, trying their best to evict you. I’m not done with my first year lease but I’m afraid to see the rent hike since they said my apartment is not subject to rent stabilization even tho this building is.
Advice to owner:
This is a very old building with a need for renovation, please stop pocketing off of the new tenants who are paying trip the rent to keep the building functioning. Have a little bit more protection for newer tenants especially during a pandemic.