72-35 112 St,
Queens, NY 11375

87 Units

Built in 1969

12 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 weeks ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.11 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
4
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 03, 2022: § 27-2104 adm code post and maintain a proper sign on wall of entrance story showing the registration number assigned by the department and the address of the building. at public hall, 1st story
Show all
flag
Hazardous
4
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Aug 29, 2019: § 27-2046.1 hmc: repair or replace the carbon monoxide detecting device(s). inoperative in the entire apartment located at apt 5g, 6th story, 3rd apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Aug 29, 2019: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective ,, in the entrance located at apt 5g, 6th story, 3rd apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Dec 02, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
E
Executive House Owners, Inc
4.2(3)
Corporate Owner
1 Property87 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
E
Edward Pascua
4.2(3)
Site Manager
1 Property87 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
F
Florence Chien
4.2(3)
Head Officer
1 Property87 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
K
Keith Werny
4.4(4)
Officer
3 Properties105 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (3)

5 months ago
Amazing building to live in in NY
Former Tenant
Pros:
Very clean, no bugs even living in the unit next to the garbage chute, very kind neighbors. Great location. Not bad parking. Can’t really hear neighbors. Best apt building I’ve lived in
Cons:
On the more expensive side. A lot of loud sirens but such is NY. Ppl on the board act like they own the place and are pretentious. If there are issues with the unit that the super needs to address they give you the typical landlord special.
Over 1 year ago
Standard nice apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
Clean and quiet
Cons:
Sometimes a wait on maintenance requests
Over 2 years ago
Cute in Queens
Former Tenant
Pros:
cute, spacious apartment. nice management and doorman. prompt with repairs and packages or mail.
Cons:
apartment needs some updates, some pest problems, noise from street
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here