NYC Buildings
/
Queens
/
Maspeth
/
47-10 Laurel Hill Boulevard
Maspeth

47-10 Laurel Hill Boulevard,
Queens, NY 11377

56 Units

•

Built in 1928

•

4 Floors

2.4(4)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Hey smart renter!
    In the past three years, this building had:
    133 complaints
    Get building reports for more information
    You Will Get:
    call-center
    Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
    rat
    The latest rodent inspection reports.
    construction
    Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
    And more...
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 1 month ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.25 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    9
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Jun 17, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department the north wall, south wall in the private hallway located at apt 3i, 3rd story, 2nd apartment from west at north
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    0
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    5
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Dec 03, 2020: section 27-2056.4 adm code- correct failure to notify occupants and/or to investigate lead-based paint hazards.
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    R
    Remzija Suljovic
    2.4(4)
    Site Manager•
    Owner•
    1 Property•56 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 0
    S
    Samir Suljovic
    2.4(4)
    Agent•
    1 Property•56 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 0
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (4)

    Over 2 years ago
    Under the Highway
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    location to buses/transit lines, not bad size apt for two people, super is really nice
    Cons:
    old, dirty, no maintenance completed in common areas, roaches everywhere even with their monthly “exterminator” visits, landlord doesn’t fix anything that they aren’t legally obligated to, if you live facing bqe you have bqe dust blowing into your open windows all day, plus the noise from the drag racers at
    Over 2 years ago
    Dirty dust with no mantener
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Old, windows dirty, stears dark
    Cons:
    No elevators 4 floor up
    Advice to owner:
    No good
    Over 2 years ago
    NEEDS IMPROVEMENTS ASAP
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Rent stabilized that’s it.
    Cons:
    Mice infested and no upgrades to apartments and old school pre war apartments. The Projects might just be a better place. The superintendent is part time.
    Advice to owner:
    Stop being cheap and spend money on fixing up the apartments and surroundings.
    Over 2 years ago
    Owner should sell ASAP.
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Quiet neighborhood despite the highway but you will get used to it.
    Cons:
    The owner sucks big time and gives zero care for tenants or their problems they bring to her about bad living. Lead paint reported and plenty of roaches and mice. Apartments look like crap.
    Advice to owner:
    Renovate immediately or sell it so someone who actually cares for their tenants and reputation.