NYC Buildings
/
Queens
/
Rego Park
/
64-20 Saunders Street

64-20 Saunders Street,
Queens, NY 11374

151 Units

Built in 1950

6 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 15
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: Yes
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Available Listings In 64-20 Saunders Street
unit
Rego Park
64-20 Saunders Street #203
$3,522
2 beds1 bathEst. Apr 2025
Future
unit
Rego Park
64-20 Saunders Street #408
$2,820
1 bed1 bathEst. Mar 2025
Future
unit
Rego Park
64-20 Saunders Street #515
$2,713
1 bed1 bathEst. Mar 2025
Future
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
190 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 17 hours ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.25 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
12
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 09, 2024: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak ceiling at public hall, 1st story, section ''center'', at east
Show all
flag
Hazardous
11
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 07, 2024: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... less than 10 square feet at ceiling in the bathroom located at apt b18, 2nd story, 1st apartment from north at east , section ''18-25'', at west original violation 17103551 issued 08-jul-24 has been upgraded to class b per administrative code §27-2017.3a(3)(a) or (b).
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
15
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 09, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches at compactor closet, 1st story, section ''center'', at east
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
N
Nautilus Realty Limited Partnership
3.2(117)
Corporate Owner
66 Properties6303 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 363
C
California Leasing LP
2.4(5)
Corporate Owner
2 Properties227 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 30
E
Estates NY Real Estate Services LLC
3.3(138)
Agent
85 Properties10599 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 615
J
Joseph Rooney
3.3(115)
Head Officer
64 Properties6093 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 349
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (3)

Over 2 years ago
The Lefrak Organization is the Worst
Former Tenant
Pros:
The heat is good , but everything else is mess !
My building had doormen and they took them away
My building the doorman took in the packages and would bring them to you at night now they are left as mess in the lobby .
The walls have water leaks which the walls reflect the white powder damages to the lobby walls . The Building office is supposed to hy law put your maintenance in an interest baring account . They use to send me the statement they stop doing that and took the money In 2017 ! So no interest baring account like
The law states . When you notify them there is problem to get fixed it took them 6 months
To come and fix the problem

Worst place These days to Live

I took them to court back in 2018 for dust creations of work being done and Judge found in my favor and got 2 months free rent !
Cons:
See above stay away
Over 2 years ago
Not worth your money
Former Tenant
Pros:
Staff is friendly and location is great
Cons:
Roach infestation & plumbing/water
Advice to owner:
Step it up. For $2K + a month I’d hope to not go two days without water and plumbing. The roaches are getting ridiculous also. & the winter is coming so let’s see if the heat works this winter.
Over 2 years ago
Decent building, big apartments
Former Tenant
Pros:
Building is nice, clean at all times. Neighborhood Is nice
Cons:
The super is not that friendly. My apartment kitchen floor was outdated and yellowing. The laundry rooms/machines constantly have problems, the buzzer/front door is always broken. The lockers for packages NEVER get used accurately or work
Advice to owner:
Invest more into the lockers and the buzzer