100-11 67 Road,Queens, NY 11375
156 Units
•Built in 1950
•6 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 11 hours ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.06 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
3
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Dec 13, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department all peeling paint surfaces in the 4th room from north at east, the 1st room from north, the kitchen located at apt 623, 6th story, 4th apartment from north at east
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
6
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Dec 05, 2024: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code remove device preventing door from being self-closing consisting of kickdown stopper at boiler room door at basement story at public hall
Show all
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Dec 02, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
F
Fontaine; Apt Owners Corp
3.9(4)
Corporate Owner•
1 Property•156 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
S
Steven Fiorillo
3.7(6)
Officer•
2 Properties•330 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
J
Joel Abreu
3.8(20)
Site Manager•
Head Officer•
29 Properties•1994 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 13
D
Delta Management LLC
3.4(5)
Agent•
9 Properties•375 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (4)
4 stars
Over 1 year ago
Clean apartment with good management
Former Tenant
Pros:
The space is fairly large and it is well maintained
Cons:
They allow a lot of dogs in the building, and it can get very noisy here.
Advice to owner:
They are responsive, but the condo board can get passive aggressive with their signage
4.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Overall Great place to live
Former Tenant
Pros:
Very well kept building, safe neighborhood, great pest control (can count on one hand the number of times I’ve encountered a roach/water bug in my apartment in the past 6 years), friendly porters, spacious 24 hour laundry room.
Cons:
Neighbors are a little nosy, strict building rules, parking & storage have long waitlists
4.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
Great location and well looked after building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Clean building, always looked after and improving services. Nice super and his team are friendly and supportive.
Cons:
Elevator number indicators were not working for long time but fixed since.
Advice to owner:
Keep it up!
2.88 stars
Over 3 years ago
Should be better
Former Tenant
Pros:
Plenty of hot water
Decent water pressure
Nice lobby
Decent water pressure
Nice lobby
Cons:
Noise: Never at peace. You hear every single step from upstairs and creaking floorboards. You hear the nonstop humming from the generators on the roof of the adjacent building. You hear the humming and feel vibration from neighbors’ AC units all summer.
Renovations: quality control is seriously lacking. I moved into a “renovated” apartment with many issues. Three out of four doors would get stuck, a fire escape window didn’t lock, no smoke alarm, kitchen and bathroom renovations included nice finishes but sloppy work with blue painters tape still holding things together, cabinet doors poorly hung, unremovable glue on tiles, etc. When building staff was called on to make repairs, work was also sloppy or unable to be completed. When outside contractors were called, they were unreliable.
Management: unresponsive and unorganized.
Cleanliness: being that there are several supers/porters, the building should be cleaner. They sweep/mop the halls weekly, if that. The lobby coffee table collects dust for weeks. Water bugs in the basement and laundry room which isn’t rare in these old buildings I guess but it could all just be cleaner. I’ve lived in cleaner buildings that just had 1 super.
Renovations: quality control is seriously lacking. I moved into a “renovated” apartment with many issues. Three out of four doors would get stuck, a fire escape window didn’t lock, no smoke alarm, kitchen and bathroom renovations included nice finishes but sloppy work with blue painters tape still holding things together, cabinet doors poorly hung, unremovable glue on tiles, etc. When building staff was called on to make repairs, work was also sloppy or unable to be completed. When outside contractors were called, they were unreliable.
Management: unresponsive and unorganized.
Cleanliness: being that there are several supers/porters, the building should be cleaner. They sweep/mop the halls weekly, if that. The lobby coffee table collects dust for weeks. Water bugs in the basement and laundry room which isn’t rare in these old buildings I guess but it could all just be cleaner. I’ve lived in cleaner buildings that just had 1 super.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here