101-06 67 Drive,Queens, NY 11375
61 Units
•Built in 1949
•7 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Available Listings In 101-06 67 Drive
Forest Hills
101-06 67 Drive #3G
$3,459
1 bed•1 bath•Est. Mar 2025
Future
Forest Hills
101-06 67 Drive #007B
$2,904
1 bed•1 bath•Est. May 2025
Future
Forest Hills
101-06 67 Drive #006F
$3,690
2 beds•1 bath•Est. Jun 2025
Future
Forest Hills
101-06 67 Drive #007G
$3,123
1 bed•1 bath•Est. Jun 2025
Future
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.37 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
5
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Nov 15, 2024: § 27-2046.1 hmc: post a proper notice of carbon monoxide detecting device requirements, in a form approved by the commissioner, in a common area of a class a multiple dwelling near inspection certificate or provide notice to tenants in a private dwelling.
Show all
Hazardous
9
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 22, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective fire door stair a door latch , 1st story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
9
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Nov 22, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective fire door stair b door latch , 1st story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
A
Arsale Realty Company LLC
3.9(276)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
76 Properties•9706 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 98
R
Rose Property Mgmt Grp LLC
3.6(204)
Agent•
46 Properties•7034 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 73
M
Michael Goldstein
3.3(7)
Head Officer•
4 Properties•263 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 6
L
Louie Mazreku
2.3(2)
Site Manager•
1 Property•61 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
2.38 stars
Over 3 years ago
W O R S T
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location to trains
Cons:
Greediest, most worthless management imaginable. Cockroaches like you wouldn’t believe. Dead mice in the hallway for months. We were on the top (7th) floor, and they did extensive roof work after YEARS of those of us on the top floor experience heavy water damage inside our apartments any time it rained. While the worked in it, our apartment was unbelievably noisy and went from very cold (-50F) to very very hot because there was no insulation whatsoever.
Then, the raised our rent for the fourth time in four years. We noped over to the other side of queens blvd and pay literally $1000 a month less for a smaller two bedroom. Don’t do it.
Then, the raised our rent for the fourth time in four years. We noped over to the other side of queens blvd and pay literally $1000 a month less for a smaller two bedroom. Don’t do it.
Advice to owner:
Your tenants are human beings, not lines on a spreadsheet. You suck
2.25 stars
Over 3 years ago
Management does not provide support to maintain the building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location near transportation, good shopping, great neighborhood
Cons:
Superintendent not given enough resources or staff to adequately maintain the building. The job is far too much for on site employees.. Rose Management unresponsive to tenant and building needs. Need more help in garbage removal and recycling, cleaning the building and attending to needed repairs.
Rose management has a large turnover of personnel in the Manhattan office. Often unreachable .
Rose management has a large turnover of personnel in the Manhattan office. Often unreachable .
Advice to owner:
Competent qualified professionals are needed for property management in the Manhattan office. Hire more people to regularly help the superintendent maintain the building. Pest control services have assigned dates to come to the building but tenants are given no timeframe to know when in the course of a day they will show up.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here