A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.1 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
6
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 08, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective latch at compactor closet, 2nd story
Show all
Hazardous
5
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Sep 21, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective latch compactor closet door at public hall, 2nd story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
8
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 21, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective latch compactor closet at public hall, 2nd story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
E
Elmhurst Woodside LLC
2.5(9)
Corporate Owner•
47 Properties•2139 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 68
S
Severino Rosario
1.5(1)
Site Manager•
1 Property•180 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 11
M
Mitchell Hill
1.5(1)
Agent•
1 Property•180 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 11
R
Rubin Schron
3.2(15)
Head Officer•
18 Properties•1695 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 61
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (1)
1.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Paid too much to live like that
Former Tenant
Pros:
Exterior grounds were nice.
Cons:
Infested with roaches, no matter how often the exterminator would come. I would sign up weekly and the whole building was just so infested. Not enough heat, we had to use space heaters because the apartment was so cold. For the amount of rent they charge, you’d think you would have heat and not live with a million roaches. Also management goes nothing about noisy neighbors. I’m talking about extreme noise, not just every day sounds. Blasting music at 6 am, screaming and running around at 2, 3 am almost every night.
Advice to owner:
Do something about the noise when tenants can’t get any sleep. Give enough heat, and my god take care of the roach infestation
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here