1663 Madison Street,Queens, NY 11385
7 Units
•Built in 1931
•4 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: No
Building Overview
Building Report
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
26 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 3 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
2.14 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
7
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Sep 14, 2024: § 329, m/d law and dept. rules and regs. provide a completed certificate of inspection visits in a proper frame at or near mailboxes, bottom edge of frame between 48-62 inches above floor missing. at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Hazardous
3
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jun 16, 2024: § 27-2046.1 hmc: repair or replace the carbon monoxide detecting device(s). defective in the entire apartment located at apt 4, 4th story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Immediately hazardous
5
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jul 22, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 1r, 1st story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
P
Paul Henry
3.2(5)
Head Officer•
2 Properties•13 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
S
Seventh And Orange Center, LLC
3.2(5)
Owner•
1 Property•7 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
T
Tom Finnican
3.2(5)
Officer•
1 Property•7 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
T
288 Troutman, LLC
3.5(27)
Head Officer•
32 Properties•116 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (5)
3 stars
1 week ago
My worst experience so far
Former Tenant
Pros:
cheap, close to train station, cute neighborhood
Cons:
multiple management companies throughout the year, at one point had gas turned off by one of the management companies, unhoused people sleeping near the entrance to the basement, inconsistent garbage pick up, occasional roach sighting
1 stars
Over 1 year ago
Not worth it at all
Former Tenant
Pros:
Free wifi. Nothing else.
Cons:
Rats, neighbors, theft, unlocked front door, people literally stealing tvs from common area, took their sweet time with security deposit that they ghosted me on and then gave it to me 7months later after i left a review on BBB
Advice to owner:
Stop giving people random homeless people to live with
4 stars
Over 2 years ago
Common Cypress
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice Interiors
A/C on every room
Nice Rooftop
Not noisy
A/C on every room
Nice Rooftop
Not noisy
Cons:
Common management is unresponsive
Advice to owner:
Push Common to improve their service.
4.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
Great amenities but lack of privacy
Former Tenant
Pros:
Free laundry, roof and backyard access
Cons:
Thin walls and floors so conversations carry. Able to hear neighbors walking and talking when they are in a separate unit.
Advice to owner:
Something with the floors or wall due to thinness and how every sound carries
3.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
Great building Horrible management
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building it’s quite modern.
Co-living / shared apartments. Weekly cleanings free Wi-Fi and community room. 
Co-living / shared apartments. Weekly cleanings free Wi-Fi and community room. 
Cons:
The walls & flooring In this building are super hollow. For example when it is raining you can hear it through the walls also, you can hear every move in our halls and stairwells from inside our private rooms. 
We have a recycling system for trash yet management does not stay on top of it so garbage is usually spilling over in front of our building.
And lastly we have no landlord ON-site or close by to check on the property to ensure agreements/rules made with the lease are being upheld . 
We have a recycling system for trash yet management does not stay on top of it so garbage is usually spilling over in front of our building.
And lastly we have no landlord ON-site or close by to check on the property to ensure agreements/rules made with the lease are being upheld . 
Advice to owner:
My advice to this property owner would be ... to Have an on-site landlord to monitor activities, to ensure that the lease agreement is being followed.
If we cannot have one that lives on site we should have one that visits every week if not once a month. And lastly we should have pest inspections for every month seeing that this location is a revolving door for tenants. 
If we cannot have one that lives on site we should have one that visits every week if not once a month. And lastly we should have pest inspections for every month seeing that this location is a revolving door for tenants.