804 Woodward Avenue,Queens, NY 11385
5 Units
•Built in 1911
•3 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
12.6 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
42
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 20, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code provide electrical outlet cover at south wall at public hall, 2nd story
Show all
Hazardous
12
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jan 06, 2022: § 27-2046.1 hmc: repair or replace the carbon monoxide detecting device(s). no installed on wall or ceiling in the entire apartment located at apt 1r, 1st story, 2nd apartment from south at west
Show all
Immediately hazardous
9
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 16, 2024: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code remove device preventing door from being self-closing consisting of hook and string at vestibule door at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
J
Jozef Falkowski
2.8(5)
Shareholder•
Head Officer•
2 Properties•7 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
W
804 Woodward Ave LLC
2.8(5)
Agent•
Corporate Owner•
1 Property•5 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
K
Kamil Falkowski
2.8(5)
Site Manager•
1 Property•5 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
B
Barbra Falkowska
2.8(5)
Shareholder•
Officer•
1 Property•5 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (5)
2.62 stars
6 months ago
best of the worst
Former Tenant
Pros:
everyone in the building is super nice, roof access, sweet area
Cons:
when something breaks landlord comes to fix it whenever he has time and mostly just puts glue on things. no improvements to property ever
3.12 stars
8 months ago
Owner/Landlord is a Schiester
Former Tenant
Pros:
Convenient location to M line, grocery stores, bars, restaurants.
Cons:
Dirty, smells like cat litter box sometimes, owner does second-rate work on repairs, owner complains about having to make repairs, owner threatens to take over apartment and move in, owner blames things that need repaired on tenants, things have to be repaired several times because owner doesn’t do it right, building roof leaks, walls in hallway have been torn open and left exposed for months at a time, messes not cleaned up after exposed walls opened, owner doesn’t get proper permits to do work, owner overcharges rent on almost every unit in the building, which has screwed up the rent stabilization system in at least two of the units (overcharged more than six years ago and now rent is $1500 too much), owner lies and pretends like he’s naive about stabilization, owner doesn’t report to government agency rent increases, building has a history of high percentage of complaints to housing authorities, owner has made several sexist and racist remarks
Advice to owner:
Sell the building to someone that wants to properly maintain it.
2.62 stars
Over 2 years ago
This building has been successfully gentrified.
Former Tenant
Pros:
The neighborhood atmosphere is nice.
Cons:
Persistent leaks. Displacement can cause people to lose their jobs and deteriorate mental health. Refusing to repair damages, and convincing a tenant to leave after making up false complaints is illegal and it’s harassment, especially if the tenants are black. That’s all.
2.38 stars
Over 3 years ago
Don’t Trust This Man
Former Tenant
Pros:
-Building is in good condition
-Laundry is right downstairs
-Close to train
-Neighborhood is nice
-Laundry is right downstairs
-Close to train
-Neighborhood is nice
Cons:
-Owner has extorted tenants. Charging extra fees for “water” and threatening to not re-sign lease if said fee isn’t paid.
-Owner is racist and anti-black. Refused to re-sign lease with perfectly good tenants
-Shower had a consistent mold problem due to a lack of ventilation
-Heat was inconsistent during the winter, leading to days when the apartment was well below the mandatory minimum of 68 degrees
-Owner insisted on fixing everything himself, which meant waiting awhile for anything to be fixed
-Intercom was broken for an entire year
-No clearly labeled recycling bins were provided and the trash was disgusting
-Owner is racist and anti-black. Refused to re-sign lease with perfectly good tenants
-Shower had a consistent mold problem due to a lack of ventilation
-Heat was inconsistent during the winter, leading to days when the apartment was well below the mandatory minimum of 68 degrees
-Owner insisted on fixing everything himself, which meant waiting awhile for anything to be fixed
-Intercom was broken for an entire year
-No clearly labeled recycling bins were provided and the trash was disgusting
Advice to owner:
-Hire technicians to service the apartment
-Stop trying to extort tenants
-Take care of the property
-Stop trying to extort tenants
-Take care of the property
3.12 stars
Over 3 years ago
Yikes Yikes Yikes
Former Tenant
Pros:
-Good area
-Close to train
-Private room
-Walls are thick
-Close to train
-Private room
-Walls are thick
Cons:
-Landlord efficiency and attitude
Advice to owner:
Work on bigotry.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here