NYC Buildings
/
Queens
/
Ridgewood
/
58-48 Catalpa Avenue

58-48 Catalpa Avenue,
Queens, NY 11385

2 Units

Built in 1901

3 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 weeks ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
2 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
1
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Sep 11, 2020: § 27-2005 admin. code: refit the building entrance door.
Show all
flag
Hazardous
3
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Sep 11, 2020: § 27-2005 admin. code: properly repair the broken or defective lower window sash in the 4th room from north at east located at apt apt2, 2nd story, apartment at west
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
O
58-5o'cat LLC
3.3(1)
Corporate Owner
2 Properties4 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
D
Dab 2012 Investment Trust LLC
3.2(6)
Corporate Owner
22 Properties54 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
A
Arthur Koptiev
3.3(1)
Site Manager
Agent
1 Property2 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
D
David Koptiev
3.3(7)
Shareholder
Officer
12 Properties38 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (1)

Over 2 years ago
Convenient location
Former Tenant
Pros:
I like that there are only 2 apartments in the whole building, the location has variety of options for food, shops, ect. , M train is close by, L is as well but further walk, security camera when someone rings doorbell in apartment you can see who’s at the door. It’s a very nice renovated apartment, exposed brick apartment.
Cons:
This was actually a great place to stay. The roomates situation was just changing, inconsistent and ruined the experience there. Also, the price always seemed to to go up for rent
Advice to owner:
Get the curtains by the entrance cleaned from time to time as the accumulate dust dirt as well as the stairs and entry
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here