A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 3 weeks ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
O
Orsola Ferrante
1.6(1)
Owner•
1 Property•3 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
F
Ferrante, Orsola
1.6(1)
Owner•
1 Property•3 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (1)
1.62 stars
Over 3 years ago
Toxic living environment
Former Tenant
Pros:
The neighborhood is very accessible to public transportation and laundry.
Cons:
The landlord operates a shady and unethical building.
1.During the winter, the tenant has no access to heat control even though there is a dial in their home. The landlord and other tenants (who are family of the landlord) dictate what the temp is based on who they are hosting that night or if they are leaving the building. This egregious behavior was identified on multiple occasions.
2. Despite being very strictly anti-pet, they proceeded to get a dog of their own in a incredible hypocritical and insensitive move. Subjecting tenants to hours of barking with thin, poorly constructed unit dividers.
3. The walls and interior. The landlord constructed a bedroom in a room with no windows and that shares a thin wall with her own bedroom. The only idea I can think of for this decision is spying. One time, I lit a ceremonial incense and she sent a text complaining about it. Meanwhile I can smell every dinner they’ve ever made.
4. Rodents. We expressed that we had seen a mouse and they gaslit us and claimed they’ve “never had this problem”. Meanwhile, there is record of them having this issue and never fixing it.
5. Only cares about making a buck due to her poor investment decision. Shamelessly stole $1000 from me. To steal money in a pandemic from tenants is unbelievable....which, among other things I’ve listed, is why I’m writing this review.
Advice to owner:
Stop scamming people and either be honest about your living space or don’t rent out apartments in your home that you are not fit to serve as a landlord for. People are signing on to have their own home, not live in some weird commune with you and your family.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here