NYC Buildings
/
Queens
/
Kew Gardens
/
84-50 Austin Street
Kew Gardens

84-50 Austin Street,
Queens, NY 11415

75 Units

•

Built in 1955

•

6 Floors

2.8(3)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 2
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 3 days ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.04 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    2
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Sep 13, 2018: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department ceiling in the 4th room from north at west located at apt 5k, 4th story, 2nd apartment from east at south
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    0
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    1
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Jun 24, 2018: § 27-2043.1 hmc install the missing or repair/replace the defective window guard(s) in accordance with the specifications of the new york city health code section 24 rcny chapter 12. wg to install = 3; wg to replace = 0; wg to repair = 2; in the entire apartment located at apt 6l, 5th story, 1st apartment from south at west
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    A
    Arizona Holding Corporation
    2.9(6)
    Corporate Owner•
    2 Properties•167 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 3
    R
    Richard Eisenberg
    3.2(119)
    Officer•
    71 Properties•3049 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 63
    R
    Rcr Management Group LLC
    3.2(119)
    Agent•
    71 Properties•3049 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 63
    M
    Miguel Mejia-puello
    2.8(3)
    Site Manager•
    1 Property•75 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 2
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (3)

    3 months ago
    its alright at most
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    barely any noise.
    Cons:
    the hallways stink, the walls are turning yellow. the apartment when i moved in the floors had paint stains all over it
    Advice to owner:
    take care of the appearance of the apartments and hallways
    Over 3 years ago
    Not great but better than public housing!
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Area is really nice
    Cons:
    Building not well taken care of
    Advice to owner:
    Invest more than just capital improvements to raise rent try actually making the building nicer
    Over 3 years ago
    Worst place to live
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Good location to train
    Cons:
    Neighbors don’t understand that it is a pet friendly building and harass you. The heat was on full blast making us having to put the a/c on during the winter which raised our electricity bill. They may tell you that you can’t hear the train but you can and it makes life very difficult. Sleeping was hard and even just working from home was difficult. The super was friendly, but would not get involved in situations with other tenants. Our downstairs neighbors complained about the sound of our dog walking and started to bang on the ceiling constantly. They blasted music before this that made our furniture shake. We also found out that they were recording us and the renters before. The super did nothing about this issue. The laundry was disgusting and most people took it elsewhere. There is absolutely no parking and it takes a good 40 minutes to find a spot. You could hear noise on all sides of you. It was like there was no privacy. Worst living situation ever. The management company is the worst ever and does nothing to fix any situation.
    Advice to owner:
    Fix the building so it’s more soundproof and inform people about how it is pet friendly and they will have to deal with pet sounds. Make sure behavior like being recorded isn’t tolerated. Be more involved so living there isn’t like living in hell.
    Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
    OR
    Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here