NYC Buildings
/
Queens
/
Jamaica Estates
/
182-30 Wexford Terrace

182-30 Wexford Terrace,
Queens, NY 11432

217 Units

Built in 1964

6 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 3
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 3 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.04 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Hazardous
5
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Mar 17, 2024: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak ceiling and east wall at basement
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
4
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Apr 24, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective missing fire door leading to east section public hall at basement
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
W
Wilshire Apartments Del LLC
3(7)
Owner
Corporate Owner
2 Properties265 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 6
O
Osher Perlow
3(7)
Head Officer
2 Properties265 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 5
S
Sf Cammebys Realty LLC
3.2(73)
Owner
Corporate Owner
178 Properties8126 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 294
P
Phil Shelby
2.4(4)
Agent
1 Property217 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (4)

Over 1 year ago
Worth it if your rent is under $2k
Former Tenant
Pros:
- Very responsive maintenance team
- Very friendly doorman
- Appreciated having doorman service for deliveries
- No waitlist for parking in building parking lot
- Safe neighborhood
- Very convenient for public transportation and access to highways (if you drive)
- Kitchen and bathroom were renovated when I moved in
Cons:
- Quality of laundry room deteriorated over time. There were times when the card refill machine did not work and it did not accept cash, so anyone dependent on the laundry room was SOL. In other cases, several washing machines would be out of service for a long time. For the machines that did "work" some of the soap dispensers were faulty, so there were times when laundry detergent was not properly dispensed to your clothes.

- Quality of tenants also deteriorated. I enjoyed several years of peaceful living until (unfortunately) my upstairs elderly neighbor passed away. The new tenant was a loud talker and TV watcher so I often heard her phone conversations, knew what she was watching on TV, was woken up by loud TV watching at 1 or 2 am. There were even times when I could hear her TV from the hallway. Building management was notified and communicated with her, but as she was paying rent they didn't rock the boat much.

I left for a quieter home, but I understand that other people don't have that option.

- As the building is older, the windows have become drafty so during winter it can feel as though there's no heat. The solution to this is to use window film to seal the windows and air conditioner to prevent the draft from overcoming the heat. It works amazingly, but this was also a contributing factor to my leaving as I wanted to live in a place where the heat worked without any extra work.

- When I first moved in, I experienced mice but this was remedied by the maintenance guys filling the holes in my unit with expanding foam and caulking along the baseboards. I never dealt with mice again. Roaches however became an issue later on and was also a factor in my leaving.
Over 2 years ago
It’s okay tbh
Former Tenant
Pros:
Affordable, Spacious, New Kitchen
Cons:
Old building, hard to contact management
Advice to owner:
Keep it clean and maybe do some renovations
Over 2 years ago
Run down Luxury
Former Tenant
Pros:
It's spacious and close to transit. Good neighborhood. No bed bugs. Laundry in building.
Cons:
Terrible property management. Cheap renovations unless you're moving out. Pest control is nonexistent. We had to outsource our own exterminator to get rid of a mice infestation. The longer you live in the building, the less they care about making sure your unit is in livable condition. We have doormen who barely do their job. Laundry machines break down often. Dead cockroaches in the hallway. Outdated decor. And reeeeallly thin walls. If there's a family living above or next to you, good luck.
Over 3 years ago
Worst Building Ever
Former Tenant
Pros:
The Doormen team was fabulous.
Cons:
- Super lied at all times.
- Rude responses from management.
- Management constantly try to charge tenants for things they are not responsible for, to the extent of attempted frauds.
Advice to owner:
Revona properties (the building managers) are the worst. So many tenants recently moved out because of their very poor managerial model. I advise you to reconsider Revona properties.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here