NYC Buildings
/
Queens
/
Rego Park
/
62-54 97 Place
Rego Park

62-54 97 Place,
Queens, NY 11374

206 Units

•

Built in 1988

•

17 Floors

3.5(2)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 2 weeks ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.19 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    24
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    May 16, 2023: § 27-2005 hmc: post, in a form approved by the commissioner, and maintain a notice in a common area of the building regarding the procedures that should be followed when a gas leak is suspected
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    11
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    May 15, 2023: § 27-2026 adm code repair the leaky and/or defective faucets at sink in the kitchen located at apt 6k, 6th story, 3rd apartment from north at east
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    5
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    May 15, 2023: § 27-2033 adm code post notice, in form approved by the department, stating the name and location of the person designated by the owner to have key to buildings heating system missing at public hall, 1st story
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    A
    Akam Associates, Inc
    3.8(246)
    Agent•
    360 Properties•33369 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 123
    T
    The Summit Condominium
    3.5(2)
    Corporate Owner•
    2 Properties•235 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 0
    C
    Christopher Alker
    3.5(2)
    Officer•
    1 Property•206 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 0
    W
    35 West 82nd Street, Inc
    3.8(32)
    Head Officer•
    103 Properties•6011 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 14
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (2)

    Over 3 years ago
    Decent building, depends on the landlord
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    The staff are pleasant and there’s in unit laundry.
    Cons:
    The building runs super warm even in winter, and when my AC broke it took over 2 months for my landlord to get it fixed.
    Over 3 years ago
    The Summit Review
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Doormen are beyond helpful
    Cons:
    Nothing really. The heat was very hot in the winter time, but that’s standard for the city.
    Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
    OR
    Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here