NYC Buildings
/
Queens
/
Forest Hills
/
105-25 67 Road
Forest Hills

105-25 67 Road,
Queens, NY 11375

48 Units

•

Built in 1950

•

6 Floors

1.5(1)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Hey smart renter!
    In the past three years, this building had:
    183 complaints
    Get building reports for more information
    You Will Get:
    call-center
    Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
    rat
    The latest rodent inspection reports.
    construction
    Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
    And more...
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 4 days ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.14 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    2
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Jun 10, 2024: § 27-2045 adm code post a proper notice of smoke detector requirements, in a form approved by the commissioner, at or near the mail box missing at public hall, 1st story
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    4
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Mar 24, 2021: section 27-2045 adm code repair or replace the smoke detector (missing) located at apt 6b, 6th story, 1st apartment from east at south
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    1
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Jun 10, 2024: § 27-2033 adm code post notice, in form approved by the department, stating the name and location of the person designated by the owner to have key to buildings heating system missing at public hall, 1st story
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    M
    Michael Rudolph
    3.2(7)
    Head Officer•
    22 Properties•935 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 1
    W
    35 West 82nd Street, Inc
    3.7(31)
    Corporate Owner•
    103 Properties•6011 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 14
    A
    Argo Real Estate LLC
    3.6(32)
    Agent•
    61 Properties•3562 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 11
    Q
    Quality & Ruskin Apts Corp
    2.3(2)
    Corporate Owner•
    13 Properties•503 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 1
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (1)

    Over 2 years ago
    absolutely awful - Stay away
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    None, niente, zero
    Cons:
    manager (Michael Rudolf) is so inefficient, lots of violations to the DOB (148 violations!)
    gets money under the table from future tenants in exchange of board approvals
    drug dealers in next building managed by this same individual
    Manager ignores complaints
    Overcrowded apartments
    The manager does not inform about bedbugs in the building
    elevator in very bad condition
    Advice to owner:
    shame on you