NYC Buildings
/
Queens
/
Briarwood
/
139-76 85 Drive
Briarwood

139-76 85 Drive,
Queens, NY 11435

30 Units

•

Built in 1951

•

6 Floors

2.5(3)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 2
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Hey smart renter!
    In the past three years, this building had:
    116 complaints
    Get building reports for more information
    You Will Get:
    call-center
    Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
    rat
    The latest rodent inspection reports.
    construction
    Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
    And more...
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 5 days ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.23 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    4
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Jan 24, 2023: section 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department .. north wall, south wall, baseboard at south wall in the kitchen located at apt 3a, 3rd story, 2nd apartment from east at south
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    1
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Jul 28, 2021: section 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective fire retardant plaster at ceiling at public hall, 6th story
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    2
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Jan 25, 2023: section 27-2056.7, 27-2056.8, 27-2056.9 adm code -certify compliance with lead-based paint hazard control requirements during period of unit vacancy by performing activities necessary to abate tested lead-based paint from required window and/or door friction surfaces for apartment and make floors smooth and cleanable, positive lead-based paint in an apartment with a child under six located at apt 3a, 3rd story, 2nd apartment from east at south
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    R
    Richard Gizzi
    3(45)
    Corporate Owner•
    122 Properties•3146 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 130
    M
    Metropolitan Property Services Inc
    2.9(45)
    Agent•
    92 Properties•2877 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 123
    J
    Jeffrey Moskin
    2.7(9)
    Officer•
    Head Officer•
    7 Properties•286 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 19
    B
    Briarwood Associates
    3(25)
    Corporate Owner•
    18 Properties•942 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 48
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (3)

    Over 2 years ago
    Plz respond to the tenants
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    The neighbors in the building are very nice,
    Cons:
    Management never responds to concerns. Dog poop all over the outside sidewalks.
    Advice to owner:
    Actually pick up/respond to tenants needs.
    Over 2 years ago
    Decent living area
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    There’s a lot of space that’s affordable
    Cons:
    There’s mice and bugs everywhere. No matter how clean you are the mice will find a way inside. The building manager doesn’t care though.
    Advice to owner:
    Get a real exterminator
    Over 2 years ago
    Horrible management
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    There are no pros.
    Cons:
    Management is lacking morals. I had to fight to get my security back when i moved out. After 4 months I finally received it. Alison belfer in the office is highly incompetent. Apartments are not worth what they charge for rent. Roaches, mice, mold and low heat is what u can expect. Thankfully i moved out of there and i am happier now.
    Advice to owner:
    Clean up your act. Fix your shitty apartments.