21-48 35 Street,
Queens, NY 11105

39 Units

Built in 1923

4 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 day ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.89 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
7
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 04, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color south wall in the bathroom located at apt 4g, 3rd story, 2nd apartment from north at east , section at northeast
Show all
flag
Hazardous
54
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jul 08, 2024: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... less than 30 sqft at east wall in the 1st room from north at east located at apt 5h, 5th story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
13
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jul 08, 2024: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... greater than 30 sqft at east wall in the 2nd room from north at east located at apt 5h, 5th story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
A
Akam Associates, Inc
3.8(246)
Agent
360 Properties33369 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 123
H
Hanley Braginsky
2.5(40)
Officer
59 Properties759 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 15
S
Steve Greenbaum
2.5(40)
Officer
58 Properties628 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 13
S
Steven Greenbaum
2.6(42)
Officer
22 Properties1115 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 16
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (4)

9 months ago
Not the worst, but not good.
Former Tenant
Pros:
1. Neighbors are reasonable with sound. Met quite a few nice neighbors here.
2. Without the location, there would be nothing good to say about it. Ditmars is great.
Cons:
Incompetence at every level, unfortunately.
1. Security is non-existent. Laundry rooms gets full of outsiders(you can easily tell) and you are sometimes unable to use it. A neighbor also told me there was a squatter that sneaks onto the roof and goes into empty apartments through the fire escape, they also stole a package..can't confirm but I do hear strange clanging sounds that wake me up sometimes.
2. Non-responsive superintendent. Me and several other neighbors had a roof leak a few months ago when the historic rains hit us. The roof is moldy and part of the roof is drooping. We haven't received any updates or response about it getting fixed.
3. Apartment was not received clean, I spent a week and over a dozen paper towel rolls getting dust off. The "renovations" done to the apartment are complete slop-jobs: painted over mold and very old worn out wood. The wood floor has no finish so it gets dirty very easily, the owner clearly does not care about the apartment.
Over 1 year ago
Do not recommend
Former Tenant
Pros:
Apartment was nicely renovated on the surface level,
Allowed pets
Not noisy
Decent laundry room, and they kept the stairs clean.
Cons:
Specifically about management company: Management company was nowhere to be found after moving in.
Poorly renovated, looked good in pictures but things fell apart easily.
Absurd rent increases.
Theres no heater in the main living space.
Terrible experience with management company overall, ignored calls and wouldn’t respond to emails or messages.
Had to harass them for the safety deposit back.

Building specific:
Rats everywhere.
Terrible garbage maintenance
Advice to owner:
Listen to your tenants. Fix the issues, do better.
Over 1 year ago
Mismanaged and gross
Former Tenant
Pros:
The location is perfect, and the renovations in the unit were nice.
Cons:
Rats everywhere, and roaches in the building. The garbage was absolutely not maintained well. Management was not responsive to issues.
Advice to owner:
Listen to your tenets!
Over 3 years ago
Apt just okay
Former Tenant
Pros:
Decent sized kitchen
All pets allowed
Rent increase not awful
Cons:
Dirty hallway
No control over heat
Lack of response from landlord
Advice to owner:
Get someone to clean the hallways
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here