A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 4 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.17 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
14
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Sep 21, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department all walls lobby area at public hall, 1st story, section ''71-10'', at north
Show all
Hazardous
9
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Sep 01, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective west wall at public hall, 1st story, section ''71-10 park''
Show all
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Aug 27, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 3v, 3rd story, 4th apartment from north at east
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
D
David Marx
3.9(1)
Head Officer•
4 Properties•275 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 5
R
Rmdm Of Ny-87, Inc
3.9(1)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•169 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
A
Adam Muskatt
3.9(1)
Site Manager•
Officer•
4 Properties•275 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 5
M
8mdr Of Queens Real Estate Management, LLC
3.9(1)
Agent•
4 Properties•275 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 5
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (1)
3.88 stars
Over 1 year ago
Decent building, safe area… but there are drawbacks.
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building feels safe and secure with cameras. Plus the police precinct is on the corner for an added feeling of safety.
Cons:
Rodents! The building has a lot of mice and the building can’t seem to get it under control. The laundry room is small with cheap washing machines that are not kept clean. The building management should have contracted with a better commercial laundry provider.
Advice to owner:
New commercial washers for the laundry room and BETTER PEST CONTROL.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here