NYC Buildings
/
Queens
/
Jackson Heights
/
32-40 89 Street
Jackson Heights

32-40 89 Street,
Queens, NY 11369

66 Units

•

Built in 1952

•

6 Floors

3.1(1)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Hey smart renter!
    In the past three years, this building had:
    90 complaints
    Get building reports for more information
    You Will Get:
    call-center
    Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
    rat
    The latest rodent inspection reports.
    construction
    Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
    And more...
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 1 day ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.13 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    3
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Oct 29, 2019: section 329, m/d law and dept. rules and regs. provide a completed certificate of inspection visits in a proper frame at or near mailboxes, bottom edge of frame between 48-62 inches above floor frame missing at public hall, 1st story
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    6
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Jun 11, 2014: section 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective wooden floor in the foyer located at apt c107, 1st story, 1st apartment from south at west
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    0
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    N
    Northridge Coop Section Iii
    3.1(1)
    Lessee•
    Corporate Owner•
    25 Properties•472 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 1
    P
    Princeton Coop Corp
    3.6(6)
    Lessee•
    Corporate Owner•
    193 Properties•2527 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 10
    J
    Jean Spera
    3.1(1)
    Site Manager•
    6 Properties•396 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 1
    W
    Wei Ming Yu
    3.1(1)
    Officer•
    6 Properties•396 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 1
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (1)

    4 days ago
    An ok building to live in
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Some nice neighbors, access to restaurants and groceries, reasonable maintenance fee, live-in supers who are responsive and helpful, general cleanliness, reliable water/heat system (usually no issue)
    Cons:
    Some inconsiderate neighbors (noise and inappropriate trash disposal), occasional package thieves, thin walls between floors (noisy when tenants do not have any carpet), weak enforcement of carpeting rule, not allowed to sublet (but apparently some people still sublet), roaches (depending on your neighbors), management is not quite responsive