A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 month ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.5 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
17
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 31, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department the south wall in the kitchen located at apt 1, 2nd story, 2nd apartment from west at north
Show all
Hazardous
63
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 31, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color at ceiling and all walls in the 2nd room from north located at apt 1, 2nd story, 2nd apartment from west at north
Show all
Immediately hazardous
16
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 25, 2023: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective bulkhead door (frame)leading to roof , 6th story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Jedmond Realty Corp
Lower East Side
95 Bowery, Manhattan, NY 10002
Units • Floors
0(0)
Lower East Side
139 Hester Street, Manhattan, NY 10002
35 Units • 6 Floors
0(0)
Lower East Side
277 Broome Street, Manhattan, NY 10002
25 Units • 6 Floors
3.3(1)
Lower East Side
334 Broome Street, Manhattan, NY 10002
21 Units • 6 Floors
0(0)
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (4)
3.38 stars
Over 1 year ago
Typical Chinatown Building
Former Tenant
Pros:
The location is great, and the apartments are nice inside.
Cons:
Common spaces tend to be very dirty. There was an abandoned apartment with trash outside the door for months. Lots of tenants will host parties on the roof, and it seems like people would wander in off the street and hang out on the roof sometimes, which made the building not feel super safe.
4.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Great location and price!
Former Tenant
Pros:
Neighbors are friendly and quiet. In a great location .
Cons:
The building is old which naturally comes with grime. They keep it as clean as possible.
Advice to owner:
Maybe add bike storage?
3.88 stars
Over 3 years ago
Quiet small not so clean
Former Tenant
Pros:
Noise levels are low
Cons:
No doorbell to let delivery drivers in
3.25 stars
Over 3 years ago
A typical LES apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
Snow was always shoveled, it was bare bones but had what I needed at the time.
Cons:
Noise was a big issue as well as package delivery confusion.