K
1678 Karyas Realty Corp
Owner
•Agent
•Corporate Owner
•2 Properties
•51 Units
•Evictions: 3
Litigation History: Yes
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
Less than 0.01 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with 1678 Karyas Realty Corp
/-73.907982,40.886925,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
Spuyten Duyvil
3620 Oxford Avenue, Manhattan, NY 10463
31 Units • 12 Floors
2.8(2)
/-73.907913,40.861903,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
University Heights
2316 Loring Place North, Bronx, NY 10468
20 Units • 5 Floors
0(0)
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
3.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Great Building, Continued Harassment from Landlord and Management
Former Tenant
Pros:
The apartments themselves are nice-looking, but most furnishings, amenities, and appliances have significant wear and it takes effort to get them replaced. Some of the wear is dangerous (think smells of gas, burning rubber, unsecured floorboards in outdoor spaces, smoking treadmills, etc.), and some should just be expected from a 10 year old building (cabinets falling off hinges, faucet knobs falling midst-bath, etc.).
Overall would be a nice place to live and even "luxurious" if the landlord would do minimal upkeep.
Overall would be a nice place to live and even "luxurious" if the landlord would do minimal upkeep.
Cons:
MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE.
There is so much potential here, yet the landlord is impossible to speak with and the building manager is abrasive. For the life of most tenants at the time of this review, we cannot understand why the landlord employs her given that we all escalate things directly to him at this point.
As mentioned in earlier pros - everything needs an update essentially but good luck getting the building manager to agree.
There is so much potential here, yet the landlord is impossible to speak with and the building manager is abrasive. For the life of most tenants at the time of this review, we cannot understand why the landlord employs her given that we all escalate things directly to him at this point.
As mentioned in earlier pros - everything needs an update essentially but good luck getting the building manager to agree.
Advice to owner:
Get a new property manager.
2.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
High ConEdison bills not pay for heat
Former Tenant
Pros:
Building Structure is good
Cons:
Celling noise machines
Bad maintenance on Engines
Do not pay for heat
Very high coned bills
Not allow tenents meetings association
No super during bussiness hours
Bad maintenance on Engines
Do not pay for heat
Very high coned bills
Not allow tenents meetings association
No super during bussiness hours
Advice to owner:
Change management and super