Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
Less than 0.01 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Julio Sersenio
/-73.932308,40.797842,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
East Harlem
432 East 120 Street, Manhattan, NY 10035
8 Units • 4 Floors
3.1(2)
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
3.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Decent with small issues
Former Tenant
Pros:
-virtual doorman
-in unit amenities functioned well
-accessible portal for maintenance requests
-neighbors reasonable
-in unit amenities functioned well
-accessible portal for maintenance requests
-neighbors reasonable
Cons:
-maintenance delays
-common areas e.g. hallways/garbage area not well maintained
-mice once
-intermittent roaches (although not an infestation)
-common areas e.g. hallways/garbage area not well maintained
-mice once
-intermittent roaches (although not an infestation)
Advice to owner:
Space could benefit from greater attention to cleanliness of front door/hallway
2.62 stars
Over 3 years ago
Review from 2 years of living in this apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
It’s a quiet building with friendly neighbors and a great neighborhood. In general things work well enough and minimal interaction with landlords.
Cons:
Very unresponsive super and landlord. Took months for them to hire an exterminator. Exterminator recommended a full apartment building treatment and they refused. Took months for them to hire a plumber. Didn’t have a working intercom/door entrance for 2 months. They have tendencies to get friends that aren’t professionals to look at problems and make them worse or do nothing.
Advice to owner:
Hire professionals to fix chronic problems. Do so after a shorter period of time of your people failing at the job.