M

Moses Berkowitz

Officer

Head Officer

2 Properties

49 Units

Evictions: 2
Litigation History: Yes
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 day ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.38 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
4
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Dec 16, 2023: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective at heating element in the 1st room from north located at apt 4a, 4th story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
flag
Hazardous
9
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Sep 30, 2021: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code remove the illegal fastening consisting of an unacceptable electromagnetic locking device install at the vestibule door at public hall, 1st story
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
6
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jul 31, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of mice in the entire apartment located at apt 3f, 3rd story, 2nd apartment from west at north
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Moses Berkowitz
Prospect Lefferts Gardens
380 Lefferts Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11225
46 Units 7 Floors
3.8(2)
Greenwood
298 20 Street, Brooklyn, NY 11215
3 Units 3 Floors
0(0)

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (2)

Over 2 years ago
Good quality for price
Former Tenant
Pros:
Elevator and laundry in building
Cons:
Mail room frequently looted
Over 3 years ago
Inconsistent Managed Building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Convenient parking, laundry in the building, gym.
Cons:
In the short time I’ve been here we’ve had 10 different contacts for management. We were all paying different rent even though the building is partially funded by the government, which means they get money from the government. The super is hard to find and management leaves tasks for him to do. Packages are often stolen and management refuses to come up with alternate solution. Gym is always flooded as well as some apartments on the first floor.
Advice to owner:
Respond to tenants, get someone to help super clean, take out the trash/recycling, snow removal in the winter. The super is one person and can’t do it alone. Fix the issue with packages being stolen. It’s not enough to just have a camera. Create a room with a key that only mail people and tenants have access to. Fix issue with flooding.