T
72-36 112th Street Gst Lmo 7, LLC
Corporate Owner
•Agent
•2 Properties
•208 Units
•Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 3 weeks ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.14 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
3
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Sep 13, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department ceiling north south and east walls 2nd roof bulklhead from east stairway a at public hall, 6th story, section ''east''
Show all
Hazardous
14
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Dec 01, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective spring balance at lower sash window 2nd from west at north wall in the 1st room from east located at apt 3p, 3rd story, 1st apartment from west at north , section at west
Show all
Immediately hazardous
14
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Dec 05, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinges in the entrance located at apt 3p, 2nd story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with 72-36 112th Street Gst Lmo 7, LLC
/-73.850625,40.727794,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
Forest Hills
102-30 67 Avenue, Queens, NY 11375
123 Units • 6 Floors
3.8(1)
/-73.838399,40.720701,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
Forest Hills
72-36 112 Street, Queens, NY 11375
85 Units • 6 Floors
2.5(1)
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
2.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
A lot of discrepancies with the lease agreement.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Located in the clean and green area of Queens, not too far from the public transportation and shopping areas.
Cons:
I found the apartment in this building through Realty Depot (realtor Stella) and everything that was covered in the lease and building rules turned out to be a lie.
- a lot of tenants smoke (including weed) in their apartments, so you constantly subject to the secondhand smoke as it travels through the hallways and windows to your apartment.
- a few families with little kids let them play in the hallways, so the sound of screaming and running around kids at 8 am is a norm.
- lease states that it’s a pet-free building , which is not true either. Multiple tenants have dogs, including big ones.
- the super is often away and even when in the building, not very helpful.
- terrible noise levels. Everything you neighbours above do - travels to your apartment. Even the sound of the TV, not to mention steps and music.
-laundry machines and dryers are absolutely filthy, covered in dirt, dust and slime. They never get cleaned and the paying system is often inop.
-water pressure in the shower sucks.
- you do get occasional roach guests.
- the ramp access is available only through the basement, which is a maze.
- moving in was a challenge, because all the stuff and furniture could be brought in only via that long maze in the basement and the hours and days you are allowed to move-in are very particular and limited.
- no hood in the kitchen, so if you cook all the upper cabinets would get the greasy coating in a while.
- overall the apartments are overpriced and the condition and quality of living in this building are not worth it.
- a lot of tenants smoke (including weed) in their apartments, so you constantly subject to the secondhand smoke as it travels through the hallways and windows to your apartment.
- a few families with little kids let them play in the hallways, so the sound of screaming and running around kids at 8 am is a norm.
- lease states that it’s a pet-free building , which is not true either. Multiple tenants have dogs, including big ones.
- the super is often away and even when in the building, not very helpful.
- terrible noise levels. Everything you neighbours above do - travels to your apartment. Even the sound of the TV, not to mention steps and music.
-laundry machines and dryers are absolutely filthy, covered in dirt, dust and slime. They never get cleaned and the paying system is often inop.
-water pressure in the shower sucks.
- you do get occasional roach guests.
- the ramp access is available only through the basement, which is a maze.
- moving in was a challenge, because all the stuff and furniture could be brought in only via that long maze in the basement and the hours and days you are allowed to move-in are very particular and limited.
- no hood in the kitchen, so if you cook all the upper cabinets would get the greasy coating in a while.
- overall the apartments are overpriced and the condition and quality of living in this building are not worth it.
Advice to owner:
To respond to the requests and questions in a professional and timely manner. To actually care about the residents and not solely collect the rent checks and ignore the concerns.
3.75 stars
Over 3 years ago
Good building poor management bad neighbors
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good super, well maintained, clean, parking available
Cons:
Management company is bad. No online payment system. Some neighbors are weird.