A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.05 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
1
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Dec 08, 2014: section 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective parapet brick walls between 4th stry and the roof at south east section at bldg
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with 270 West 25th Street, LLC
Chelsea
270 West 25 Street, Manhattan, NY 10001
20 Units • 4 Floors
2.2(2)
Pelham Bay
1634 Crosby Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461
18 Units • 5 Floors
0(0)
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
1.88 stars
Over 2 years ago
Prime location, horrible digs
Former Tenant
Pros:
- location - building with few units - laundry in basement - live in super highly unresponsive, need to be on a harrassment/constant contact level to actually get issues looked at/repaired
Cons:
- there is a backyard courtyard/garden (lovely) but has been essentially claimed as the super’s own, uncomfortable to go down there - constantly broken, highly dangerous elevator—lawsuits have been filed against elevator company but elevator has not been replaced - mice throughout building (word of mouth) but visible in basement. Super keeps back door open during reasonable temperatures for reasons unknown - roaches in apartments, mainly due to issues not being fixed (ie broken sink pipes for 6+ months leaving standing water under sink fixture - breeding ground for them - homeless congregate occasionally as there are stairs leading to basement - no legitimate doorman system - anyone buzzes in and packages were often stolen - heat in winter was so unbearable I left my window open most of the time
2.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Absolutely intesponsivle greedy management and superintendent
Former Tenant
Pros:
Very convenient for transportation
Cons:
Both management and Superintendent is slow to response. Superintendent (husband and wife) constantly lie and cover up their mistake to the management office when the tenant complains.